rs650724

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_001845.6(COL4A1):​c.4800C>T​(p.Ser1600Ser) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.1 in 1,613,748 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 9,606 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. S1600S) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.13 ( 1605 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.097 ( 8001 hom. )

Consequence

COL4A1
NM_001845.6 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:11

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.103

Publications

16 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
COL4A1 (HGNC:2202): (collagen type IV alpha 1 chain) This gene encodes a type IV collagen alpha protein. Type IV collagen proteins are integral components of basement membranes. This gene shares a bidirectional promoter with a paralogous gene on the opposite strand. The protein consists of an amino-terminal 7S domain, a triple-helix forming collagenous domain, and a carboxy-terminal non-collagenous domain. It functions as part of a heterotrimer and interacts with other extracellular matrix components such as perlecans, proteoglycans, and laminins. In addition, proteolytic cleavage of the non-collagenous carboxy-terminal domain results in a biologically active fragment known as arresten, which has anti-angiogenic and tumor suppressor properties. Mutations in this gene cause porencephaly, cerebrovascular disease, and renal and muscular defects. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Dec 2014]
COL4A1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • brain small vessel disease 1 with or without ocular anomalies
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, MODERATE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: G2P, Ambry Genetics, PanelApp Australia, Orphanet, Genomics England PanelApp
  • autosomal dominant familial hematuria-retinal arteriolar tortuosity-contractures syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG, MODERATE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp, Orphanet, Ambry Genetics
  • microangiopathy and leukoencephalopathy, pontine, autosomal dominant
    Inheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics
  • familial porencephaly
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • pontine autosomal dominant microangiopathy with leukoencephalopathy
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • retinal arterial tortuosity
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • muscular dystrophy-dystroglycanopathy, type A
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.58).
BP6
Variant 13-110152462-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr13-110152462-G-A is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 258260.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.103 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.202 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
COL4A1NM_001845.6 linkc.4800C>T p.Ser1600Ser synonymous_variant Exon 51 of 52 ENST00000375820.10 NP_001836.3

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
COL4A1ENST00000375820.10 linkc.4800C>T p.Ser1600Ser synonymous_variant Exon 51 of 52 1 NM_001845.6 ENSP00000364979.4 P02462-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.130
AC:
19848
AN:
152128
Hom.:
1593
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.205
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00768
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.193
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.125
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00462
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.0720
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0833
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.139
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0942
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.131
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.113
AC:
28294
AN:
250762
AF XY:
0.107
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.208
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.226
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.122
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00337
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0852
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0966
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.111
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0969
AC:
141563
AN:
1461502
Hom.:
8001
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0956
AC XY:
69528
AN XY:
727052
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.212
AC:
7111
AN:
33480
American (AMR)
AF:
0.224
AC:
10024
AN:
44682
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.120
AC:
3141
AN:
26130
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00217
AC:
86
AN:
39700
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0775
AC:
6680
AN:
86220
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0847
AC:
4509
AN:
53238
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.140
AC:
800
AN:
5732
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0928
AC:
103178
AN:
1111934
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0999
AC:
6034
AN:
60386
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.486
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
7669
15338
23006
30675
38344
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
3886
7772
11658
15544
19430
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.131
AC:
19895
AN:
152246
Hom.:
1605
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.131
AC XY:
9723
AN XY:
74456
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.205
AC:
8524
AN:
41532
American (AMR)
AF:
0.193
AC:
2952
AN:
15280
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.125
AC:
435
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00443
AC:
23
AN:
5188
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0718
AC:
347
AN:
4832
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0833
AC:
883
AN:
10600
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.146
AC:
43
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0942
AC:
6407
AN:
68028
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.130
AC:
274
AN:
2108
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.498
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
877
1753
2630
3506
4383
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
212
424
636
848
1060
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.112
Hom.:
526
Bravo
AF:
0.144
Asia WGS
AF:
0.0680
AC:
237
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.102
EpiControl
AF:
0.105

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:11
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:5
-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Mar 09, 2016
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Nov 14, 2017
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Brain small vessel disease 1 with or without ocular anomalies Benign:3
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Jun 01, 2017
Athena Diagnostics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jun 14, 2016
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:2
Feb 04, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

Autosomal dominant familial hematuria-retinal arteriolar tortuosity-contractures syndrome Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.58
CADD
Benign
3.1
DANN
Benign
0.47
PhyloP100
0.10
Mutation Taster
=78/22
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs650724; hg19: chr13-110804809; COSMIC: COSV65428107; API