rs6561424
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_003850.3(SUCLA2):c.371+9C>T variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.787 in 1,610,790 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 503,879 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.73 ( 41387 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.79 ( 462492 hom. )
Consequence
SUCLA2
NM_003850.3 intron
NM_003850.3 intron
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 0.800
Genes affected
SUCLA2 (HGNC:11448): (succinate-CoA ligase ADP-forming subunit beta) Succinyl-CoA synthetase (SCS) is a mitochondrial matrix enzyme that acts as a heterodimer, being composed of an invariant alpha subunit and a substrate-specific beta subunit. The protein encoded by this gene is an ATP-specific SCS beta subunit that dimerizes with the SCS alpha subunit to form SCS-A, an essential component of the tricarboxylic acid cycle. SCS-A hydrolyzes ATP to convert succinate to succinyl-CoA. Defects in this gene are a cause of myopathic mitochondrial DNA depletion syndrome. A pseudogene of this gene has been found on chromosome 6. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.84).
BP6
Variant 13-47988873-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr13-47988873-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 139358.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr13-47988873-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (NFE) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.809 is higher than 0.05.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SUCLA2 | NM_003850.3 | c.371+9C>T | intron_variant | ENST00000646932.1 | NP_003841.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SUCLA2 | ENST00000646932.1 | c.371+9C>T | intron_variant | NM_003850.3 | ENSP00000494360 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.730 AC: 110878AN: 151976Hom.: 41382 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
110878
AN:
151976
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.748 AC: 187378AN: 250556Hom.: 71245 AF XY: 0.750 AC XY: 101688AN XY: 135602
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
187378
AN:
250556
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
101688
AN XY:
135602
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.793 AC: 1157108AN: 1458696Hom.: 462492 Cov.: 37 AF XY: 0.789 AC XY: 572835AN XY: 725764
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
1157108
AN:
1458696
Hom.:
Cov.:
37
AF XY:
AC XY:
572835
AN XY:
725764
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.729 AC: 110913AN: 152094Hom.: 41387 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.728 AC XY: 54104AN XY: 74366
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
110913
AN:
152094
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
AC XY:
54104
AN XY:
74366
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
2392
AN:
3476
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:11
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:5
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Jun 30, 2011 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | May 21, 2015 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
not provided Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Athena Diagnostics | Apr 20, 2017 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Mayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo Clinic | Feb 19, 2016 | - - |
Mitochondrial DNA depletion syndrome, encephalomyopathic form with methylmalonic aciduria Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Jul 15, 2021 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
RBP_binding_hub_radar
RBP_regulation_power_radar
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at