Menu
GeneBe

rs662702

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The NM_019040.5(ELP4):c.*3998C>T variant causes a 3 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.129 in 232,834 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2,906 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.15 ( 2395 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.098 ( 511 hom. )

Consequence

ELP4
NM_019040.5 3_prime_UTR

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:9

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.687
Variant links:
Genes affected
ELP4 (HGNC:1171): (elongator acetyltransferase complex subunit 4) This gene encodes a component of the six subunit elongator complex, a histone acetyltransferase complex that associates directly with RNA polymerase II during transcriptional elongation. The human gene can partially complement sensitivity phenotypes of yeast ELP4 deletion mutants. This gene has also been associated with Rolandic epilepsy. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Dec 2013]
PAX6 (HGNC:8620): (paired box 6) This gene encodes paired box protein Pax-6, one of many human homologs of the Drosophila melanogaster gene prd. In addition to a conserved paired box domain, a hallmark feature of this gene family, the encoded protein also contains a homeobox domain. Both domains are known to bind DNA and function as regulators of gene transcription. Activity of this protein is key in the development of neural tissues, particularly the eye. This gene is regulated by multiple enhancers located up to hundreds of kilobases distant from this locus. Mutations in this gene or in the enhancer regions can cause ocular disorders such as aniridia and Peter's anomaly. Use of alternate promoters and alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants encoding different isoforms. Interestingly, inclusion of a particular alternate coding exon has been shown to increase the length of the paired box domain and alter its DNA binding specificity. Consequently, isoforms that carry the shorter paired box domain regulate a different set of genes compared to the isoforms carrying the longer paired box domain. [provided by RefSeq, Mar 2019]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.79).
BP6
Variant 11-31787522-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr11-31787522-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 304328.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.292 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
ELP4NM_019040.5 linkuse as main transcriptc.*3998C>T 3_prime_UTR_variant 10/10 ENST00000640961.2
ELP4NM_001288725.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.*3984C>T 3_prime_UTR_variant 11/11
ELP4NM_001288726.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.*4093C>T 3_prime_UTR_variant 12/12

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
ELP4ENST00000640961.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.*3998C>T 3_prime_UTR_variant 10/101 NM_019040.5 P3Q96EB1-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.145
AC:
22126
AN:
152082
Hom.:
2383
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.296
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.0318
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.165
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.117
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.191
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.0824
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0860
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.190
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0630
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.139
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0976
AC:
7870
AN:
80634
Hom.:
511
Cov.:
0
AF XY:
0.0948
AC XY:
3516
AN XY:
37082
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.289
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.186
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.110
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.125
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0755
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.117
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0684
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.113
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.146
AC:
22168
AN:
152200
Hom.:
2395
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.146
AC XY:
10869
AN XY:
74420
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.296
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.165
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.117
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.191
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.0812
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.0860
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0630
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.138
Alfa
AF:
0.0815
Hom.:
1518
Bravo
AF:
0.162
Asia WGS
AF:
0.167
AC:
580
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:9
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Aniridia 1 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Foveal hypoplasia 1 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Congenital aniridia Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJun 14, 2016- -
11p partial monosomy syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Aniridia 1;C0344559:Irido-corneo-trabecular dysgenesis Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeJul 21, 2023- -
Autosomal dominant keratitis Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
not provided Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxMay 14, 2021This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 21421876, 22447870) -
carboxymethyl-dextran-A2-gadolinium-DOTA Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Anophthalmia-microphthalmia syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.79
Cadd
Benign
15
Dann
Benign
0.67

Splicing

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs662702; hg19: chr11-31809070; API