rs6670661
Variant names:
Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -12 ACMG points: 0P and 12B. BP4_StrongBA1
The NM_001017425.3(KCNK2):c.964-7728G>A variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.51 in 152,072 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 21,141 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar.
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.51 ( 21141 hom., cov: 32)
Consequence
KCNK2
NM_001017425.3 intron
NM_001017425.3 intron
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Not reported in ClinVar
Conservation
PhyloP100: -0.650
Publications
1 publications found
Genes affected
KCNK2 (HGNC:6277): (potassium two pore domain channel subfamily K member 2) This gene encodes one of the members of the two-pore-domain background potassium channel protein family. This type of potassium channel is formed by two homodimers that create a channel that leaks potassium out of the cell to control resting membrane potential. The channel can be opened, however, by certain anesthetics, membrane stretching, intracellular acidosis, and heat. Three transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification was made for transcript
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -12 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.98).
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (EAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.595 is higher than 0.05.
Transcripts
RefSeq
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KCNK2 | NM_001017425.3 | c.964-7728G>A | intron_variant | Intron 6 of 6 | ENST00000444842.7 | NP_001017425.2 |
Ensembl
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KCNK2 | ENST00000444842.7 | c.964-7728G>A | intron_variant | Intron 6 of 6 | 1 | NM_001017425.3 | ENSP00000394033.2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.510 AC: 77464AN: 151954Hom.: 21135 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
77464
AN:
151954
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
We have no GnomAD4 exomes data on this position. Probably position not covered by the project.
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.510 AC: 77498AN: 152072Hom.: 21141 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.510 AC XY: 37953AN XY: 74346 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
77498
AN:
152072
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
37953
AN XY:
74346
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
AC:
13093
AN:
41474
American (AMR)
AF:
AC:
8742
AN:
15292
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
AC:
1747
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
AC:
3157
AN:
5148
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
AC:
1646
AN:
4824
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
AC:
7245
AN:
10566
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
AC:
122
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
AC:
40078
AN:
67980
Other (OTH)
AF:
AC:
1047
AN:
2114
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.502
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1864
3728
5592
7456
9320
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance
Age Distribution
Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
668
1336
2004
2672
3340
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
1575
AN:
3478
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
DANN
Benign
PhyloP100
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at
Publications
You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.