rs6735208
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_001164508.2(NEB):c.3081A>T(p.Lys1027Asn) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.79 in 1,612,454 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 516,236 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 12/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★). Another nucleotide change resulting in same amino acid change has been previously reported as Likely benignin UniProt.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001164508.2 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NEB | NM_001164507.2 | c.3081A>T | p.Lys1027Asn | missense_variant | 31/182 | ENST00000427231.7 | NP_001157979.2 | |
NEB | NM_001164508.2 | c.3081A>T | p.Lys1027Asn | missense_variant | 31/182 | ENST00000397345.8 | NP_001157980.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NEB | ENST00000397345.8 | c.3081A>T | p.Lys1027Asn | missense_variant | 31/182 | 5 | NM_001164508.2 | ENSP00000380505 | P5 | |
NEB | ENST00000427231.7 | c.3081A>T | p.Lys1027Asn | missense_variant | 31/182 | 5 | NM_001164507.2 | ENSP00000416578 | A2 | |
NEB | ENST00000409198.5 | c.3081A>T | p.Lys1027Asn | missense_variant | 31/150 | 5 | ENSP00000386259 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.693 AC: 105274AN: 152000Hom.: 39575 Cov.: 31
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.761 AC: 189525AN: 249064Hom.: 74923 AF XY: 0.762 AC XY: 102911AN XY: 135114
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.801 AC: 1169316AN: 1460336Hom.: 476653 Cov.: 51 AF XY: 0.798 AC XY: 579485AN XY: 726562
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.692 AC: 105297AN: 152118Hom.: 39583 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.695 AC XY: 51713AN XY: 74376
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:5
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Jan 05, 2016 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Apr 05, 2013 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | Nov 26, 2014 | This is a RefSeq error. The reference base (c.3081A) is the minor allele. This a llele (A) has been identified in 17% (1433/8260) of European American chromosome s and 57% (2230/3892) of African American chromosomes by the NHLBI Exome Sequenc ing Project (http://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS/; dbSNP rs6735208) and thus meets criteria to be classified as benign. - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | - | Likely benign based on allele frequency in 1000 Genomes Project or ESP global frequency and its presence in a patient with a rare or unrelated disease phenotype. NOT Sanger confirmed. - |
Nemaline myopathy 2 Benign:4
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Natera, Inc. | Sep 16, 2020 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Jul 10, 2021 | - - |
not provided Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Feb 27, 2017 | Variant summary: The NEB c.3081A>T (p.Lys1027Asn) variant involves the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide, which 2/3 in silico tools (SNPs&GO not captured due to query not functioning and Mutation Taster having a low p-value) predict a damaging outcome. The variant of interest was observed in the large, broad control population, ExAC, with an allele frequency of 0.749942 (90494/120668 (35419 homozygotes)), which indicates that the T allele is the major allele found in the general population. In addition, multiple clinical diagnostic laboratories classify the variant as Benign. Therefore, the variant of interest has been classified as Benign. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Athena Diagnostics | Mar 07, 2019 | - - |
Arthrogryposis multiplex congenita 6 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Jul 10, 2021 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at