rs6771157
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1
The NM_006514.4(SCN10A):āc.3393C>Gā(p.Thr1131=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.247 in 1,613,744 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 51,431 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (ā ā ).
Frequency
Genomes: š 0.22 ( 4092 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes š: 0.25 ( 47339 hom. )
Consequence
SCN10A
NM_006514.4 synonymous
NM_006514.4 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 0.553
Genes affected
SCN10A (HGNC:10582): (sodium voltage-gated channel alpha subunit 10) The protein encoded by this gene is a tetrodotoxin-resistant voltage-gated sodium channel alpha subunit. The properties of the channel formed by the encoded transmembrane protein can be altered by interaction with different beta subunits. This protein may be involved in the onset of pain associated with peripheral neuropathy. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Jun 2014]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.87).
BP6
Variant 3-38722372-G-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr3-38722372-G-C is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 259998.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr3-38722372-G-C is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.553 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (EAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.388 is higher than 0.05.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCN10A | NM_006514.4 | c.3393C>G | p.Thr1131= | synonymous_variant | 20/28 | ENST00000449082.3 | NP_006505.4 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCN10A | ENST00000449082.3 | c.3393C>G | p.Thr1131= | synonymous_variant | 20/28 | 1 | NM_006514.4 | ENSP00000390600 | P4 | |
SCN10A | ENST00000655275.1 | c.3417C>G | p.Thr1139= | synonymous_variant | 20/28 | ENSP00000499510 | ||||
SCN10A | ENST00000643924.1 | c.3390C>G | p.Thr1130= | synonymous_variant | 19/27 | ENSP00000495595 | A1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.221 AC: 33546AN: 151952Hom.: 4092 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
33546
AN:
151952
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.239 AC: 60154AN: 251362Hom.: 7888 AF XY: 0.244 AC XY: 33159AN XY: 135846
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
60154
AN:
251362
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
33159
AN XY:
135846
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.250 AC: 365387AN: 1461674Hom.: 47339 Cov.: 35 AF XY: 0.250 AC XY: 181821AN XY: 727164
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
365387
AN:
1461674
Hom.:
Cov.:
35
AF XY:
AC XY:
181821
AN XY:
727164
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.221 AC: 33555AN: 152070Hom.: 4092 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.223 AC XY: 16542AN XY: 74318
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
33555
AN:
152070
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
16542
AN XY:
74318
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
947
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:10
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:6
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Apr 09, 2023 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Molecular Diagnostic Laboratory for Inherited Cardiovascular Disease, Montreal Heart Institute | May 17, 2017 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Sep 22, 2016 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center | - | - - |
not provided Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Brugada syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Episodic pain syndrome, familial, 2 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Jul 15, 2021 | - - |
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Dec 21, 2018 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at