rs6781

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The NM_003863.4(DPM2):ā€‹c.213T>Cā€‹(p.Tyr71=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.844 in 1,610,162 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 578,159 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (ā˜…ā˜…).

Frequency

Genomes: š‘“ 0.80 ( 49374 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes š‘“: 0.85 ( 528785 hom. )

Consequence

DPM2
NM_003863.4 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:8

Conservation

PhyloP100: -1.13
Variant links:
Genes affected
DPM2 (HGNC:3006): (dolichyl-phosphate mannosyltransferase subunit 2, regulatory) Dolichol-phosphate mannose (Dol-P-Man) serves as a donor of mannosyl residues on the lumenal side of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). Lack of Dol-P-Man results in defective surface expression of GPI-anchored proteins. Dol-P-Man is synthesized from GDP-mannose and dolichol-phosphate on the cytosolic side of the ER by the enzyme dolichyl-phosphate mannosyltransferase. The protein encoded by this gene is a hydrophobic protein that contains 2 predicted transmembrane domains and a putative ER localization signal near the C terminus. This protein associates with DPM1 in vivo and is required for the ER localization and stable expression of DPM1 and also enhances the binding of dolichol-phosphate to DPM1. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.83).
BP6
Variant 9-127935764-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr9-127935764-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 128920.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr9-127935764-A-G is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (NFE) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.868 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
DPM2NM_003863.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.213T>C p.Tyr71= synonymous_variant 4/4 ENST00000314392.13
DPM2NM_001378437.1 linkuse as main transcriptc.123T>C p.Tyr41= synonymous_variant 3/3
DPM2NR_165631.1 linkuse as main transcriptn.370T>C non_coding_transcript_exon_variant 4/4
DPM2NR_165632.1 linkuse as main transcriptn.54T>C non_coding_transcript_exon_variant 2/2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
DPM2ENST00000314392.13 linkuse as main transcriptc.213T>C p.Tyr71= synonymous_variant 4/41 NM_003863.4 P1
ENST00000592240.5 linkuse as main transcriptn.143+1119A>G intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant 5

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.800
AC:
121591
AN:
151956
Hom.:
49343
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.673
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.919
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.842
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.731
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.654
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.689
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.902
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.752
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.874
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.793
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.818
AC:
205198
AN:
250718
Hom.:
84941
AF XY:
0.817
AC XY:
110682
AN XY:
135526
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.669
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.873
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.734
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.672
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.712
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.896
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.868
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.817
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.849
AC:
1237344
AN:
1458086
Hom.:
528785
Cov.:
48
AF XY:
0.845
AC XY:
612769
AN XY:
725488
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.676
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.869
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.729
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.619
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.713
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.898
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.874
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.822
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.800
AC:
121671
AN:
152076
Hom.:
49374
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.798
AC XY:
59360
AN XY:
74356
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.673
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.842
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.731
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.653
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.691
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.902
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.874
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.795
Alfa
AF:
0.841
Hom.:
51756
Bravo
AF:
0.792
Asia WGS
AF:
0.715
AC:
2490
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.856
EpiControl
AF:
0.856

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:8
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenetic Services Laboratory, University of ChicagoAug 15, 2013- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxJan 05, 2016This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)Jan 16, 2014- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center-- -
Congenital muscular dystrophy with intellectual disability and severe epilepsy Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome-Nilou LabJul 30, 2021- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeFeb 01, 2024- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDiagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen-- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.83
CADD
Benign
1.8
DANN
Benign
0.83

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs6781; hg19: chr9-130698043; COSMIC: COSV58709132; COSMIC: COSV58709132; API