rs6782980
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_005677.4(COLQ):āc.934A>Gā(p.Ser312Gly) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0191 in 1,613,888 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1,008 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (ā ā ).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_005677.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COLQ | NM_005677.4 | c.934A>G | p.Ser312Gly | missense_variant | 13/17 | ENST00000383788.10 | NP_005668.2 | |
COLQ | NM_080538.2 | c.904A>G | p.Ser302Gly | missense_variant | 13/17 | NP_536799.1 | ||
COLQ | NM_080539.4 | c.832A>G | p.Ser278Gly | missense_variant | 12/16 | NP_536800.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COLQ | ENST00000383788.10 | c.934A>G | p.Ser312Gly | missense_variant | 13/17 | 1 | NM_005677.4 | ENSP00000373298 | P4 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0494 AC: 7523AN: 152142Hom.: 454 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0216 AC: 5425AN: 251474Hom.: 202 AF XY: 0.0202 AC XY: 2750AN XY: 135904
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0160 AC: 23364AN: 1461628Hom.: 553 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0163 AC XY: 11864AN XY: 727122
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0495 AC: 7535AN: 152260Hom.: 455 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0474 AC XY: 3527AN XY: 74452
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | Aug 15, 2013 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Nov 04, 2016 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Feb 01, 2016 | - - |
Congenital myasthenic syndrome 5 Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 29, 2024 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
not provided Benign:2
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC) | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at