rs6788448
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points: 0P and 14B. BP4_StrongBP6_ModerateBA1
The NM_032279.4(ATP13A4):c.543A>G(p.Ile181Met) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.411 in 1,581,422 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 135,312 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★). Another nucleotide change resulting in same amino acid change has been previously reported as Likely benignin UniProt.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_032279.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATP13A4 | NM_032279.4 | c.543A>G | p.Ile181Met | missense_variant | 6/30 | ENST00000342695.9 | |
ATP13A4 | XM_047449063.1 | c.672A>G | p.Ile224Met | missense_variant | 8/32 | ||
ATP13A4 | XM_017007319.2 | c.672A>G | p.Ile224Met | missense_variant | 8/27 | ||
ATP13A4 | XR_007095757.1 | n.936A>G | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 8/26 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATP13A4 | ENST00000342695.9 | c.543A>G | p.Ile181Met | missense_variant | 6/30 | 1 | NM_032279.4 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes ? AF: 0.439 AC: 66755AN: 151896Hom.: 14813 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.428 AC: 107402AN: 250688Hom.: 23521 AF XY: 0.424 AC XY: 57527AN XY: 135556
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.408 AC: 582961AN: 1429408Hom.: 120481 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.408 AC XY: 291041AN XY: 712910
GnomAD4 genome ? AF: 0.440 AC: 66815AN: 152014Hom.: 14831 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.438 AC XY: 32534AN XY: 74312
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Dec 12, 2018 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at