rs6794496

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -19 ACMG points: 0P and 19B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_153240.5(NPHP3):​c.3759G>A​(p.Leu1253Leu) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.143 in 1,612,284 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 21,825 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.14 ( 2125 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.14 ( 19700 hom. )

Consequence

NPHP3
NM_153240.5 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:10

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.58

Publications

18 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
NPHP3 (HGNC:7907): (nephrocystin 3) This gene encodes a protein containing a coiled-coil (CC) domain, a tubulin-tyrosine ligase (TTL) domain, and a tetratrico peptide repeat (TPR) domain. The encoded protein interacts with nephrocystin, it is required for normal ciliary development, and it functions in renal tubular development. Mutations in this gene are associated with nephronophthisis type 3, and also with renal-hepatic-pancreatic dysplasia, and Meckel syndrome type 7. Naturally occurring read-through transcripts exist between this gene and the downstream ACAD11 (acyl-CoA dehydrogenase family, member 11) gene. [provided by RefSeq, Feb 2011]
NPHP3-ACAD11 (HGNC:48351): (NPHP3-ACAD11 readthrough (NMD candidate)) This locus represents naturally occurring read-through transcription between the neighboring NPHP3 (nephronophthisis 3, adolescent) and ACAD11 (acyl-CoA dehydrogenase family, member 11) genes on chromosome 3. The read-through transcript is a candidate for nonsense-mediated mRNA decay (NMD), and is thus unlikely to produce a protein product. [provided by RefSeq, Feb 2011]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -19 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.28).
BP6
Variant 3-132682756-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr3-132682756-C-T is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 262710.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=1.58 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (EAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.562 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
NPHP3NM_153240.5 linkc.3759G>A p.Leu1253Leu synonymous_variant Exon 26 of 27 ENST00000337331.10 NP_694972.3 Q7Z494-1
NPHP3-ACAD11NR_037804.1 linkn.3765G>A non_coding_transcript_exon_variant Exon 25 of 45

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
NPHP3ENST00000337331.10 linkc.3759G>A p.Leu1253Leu synonymous_variant Exon 26 of 27 1 NM_153240.5 ENSP00000338766.5 Q7Z494-1
NPHP3-ACAD11ENST00000632629.1 linkc.405G>A p.Leu135Leu synonymous_variant Exon 3 of 5 2 ENSP00000488520.1 A0A0J9YXS1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.143
AC:
21765
AN:
152008
Hom.:
2134
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.112
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.118
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.107
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.0848
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.581
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.193
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.168
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.0918
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.133
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.143
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.161
AC:
40455
AN:
251240
AF XY:
0.161
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.115
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0771
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0855
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.585
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.165
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.128
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.149
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.143
AC:
209319
AN:
1460158
Hom.:
19700
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
0.144
AC XY:
104832
AN XY:
726416
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.109
AC:
3630
AN:
33454
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0801
AC:
3581
AN:
44724
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0861
AC:
2248
AN:
26120
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.590
AC:
23388
AN:
39656
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.168
AC:
14459
AN:
86206
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.167
AC:
8930
AN:
53404
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.104
AC:
600
AN:
5764
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.129
AC:
143459
AN:
1110486
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.150
AC:
9024
AN:
60344
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.460
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
8271
16542
24812
33083
41354
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
5374
10748
16122
21496
26870
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.143
AC:
21761
AN:
152126
Hom.:
2125
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.148
AC XY:
10997
AN XY:
74370
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.112
AC:
4665
AN:
41534
American (AMR)
AF:
0.107
AC:
1628
AN:
15278
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0848
AC:
294
AN:
3468
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.579
AC:
2996
AN:
5172
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.193
AC:
933
AN:
4822
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.168
AC:
1777
AN:
10570
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.102
AC:
30
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.133
AC:
9035
AN:
67970
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.140
AC:
296
AN:
2108
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.503
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
882
1764
2645
3527
4409
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
238
476
714
952
1190
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.136
Hom.:
8199
Bravo
AF:
0.137
Asia WGS
AF:
0.317
AC:
1100
AN:
3476
EpiCase
AF:
0.123
EpiControl
AF:
0.119

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:10
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:5
-
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 22, 2016
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Renal-hepatic-pancreatic dysplasia 1 Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

NPHP3-related Meckel-like syndrome Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Nephronophthisis Benign:1
Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:1
-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

Nephronophthisis 3 Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.28
CADD
Benign
9.3
DANN
Benign
0.75
PhyloP100
1.6
Mutation Taster
=99/1
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs6794496; hg19: chr3-132401600; COSMIC: COSV107300382; COSMIC: COSV107300382; API