rs685935
Variant names:
Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -4 ACMG points: 0P and 4B. BP4_Strong
The NM_130810.4(DNAAF4):c.406-11552G>T variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar.
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.0 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Failed GnomAD Quality Control
Consequence
DNAAF4
NM_130810.4 intron
NM_130810.4 intron
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Not reported in ClinVar
Conservation
PhyloP100: -4.62
Publications
12 publications found
Genes affected
DNAAF4 (HGNC:21493): (dynein axonemal assembly factor 4) This gene encodes a tetratricopeptide repeat domain-containing protein. The encoded protein interacts with estrogen receptors and the heat shock proteins, Hsp70 and Hsp90. An homologous protein in rat has been shown to function in neuronal migration in the developing neocortex. A chromosomal translocation involving this gene is associated with a susceptibility to developmental dyslexia. Mutations in this gene are associated with deficits in reading and spelling. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. Read-through transcription also exists between this gene and the downstream cell cycle progression 1 (CCPG1) gene. [provided by RefSeq, Mar 2011]
DNAAF4-CCPG1 (HGNC:43019): (DNAAF4-CCPG1 readthrough (NMD candidate)) This locus represents naturally occurring read-through transcription between the neighboring dyslexia susceptibility 1 candidate 1 (DYX1C1) and cell cycle progression 1 (CCPG1) genes on chromosome 15. The read-through transcript is a candidate for nonsense-mediated mRNA decay (NMD), and is thus unlikely to produce a protein product. [provided by RefSeq, Mar 2011]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification was made for transcript
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -4 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-1.05).
Transcripts
RefSeq
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DNAAF4 | NM_130810.4 | c.406-11552G>T | intron_variant | Intron 4 of 9 | ENST00000321149.7 | NP_570722.2 | ||
| DNAAF4 | NM_001033560.2 | c.406-11552G>T | intron_variant | Intron 4 of 8 | NP_001028732.1 | |||
| DNAAF4 | NM_001033559.3 | c.406-11552G>T | intron_variant | Intron 4 of 8 | NP_001028731.1 | |||
| DNAAF4-CCPG1 | NR_037923.1 | n.661-11552G>T | intron_variant | Intron 3 of 15 |
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00 AC: 0AN: 151926Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
0
AN:
151926
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
We have no GnomAD4 exomes data on this position. Probably position not covered by the project.
GnomAD4 genome Data not reliable, filtered out with message: AC0 AF: 0.00 AC: 0AN: 151926Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 74164
GnomAD4 genome
Data not reliable, filtered out with message: AC0
AF:
AC:
0
AN:
151926
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
0
AN XY:
74164
African (AFR)
AF:
AC:
0
AN:
41336
American (AMR)
AF:
AC:
0
AN:
15254
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
AC:
0
AN:
3470
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
AC:
0
AN:
5182
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
AC:
0
AN:
4826
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
AC:
0
AN:
10566
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
AC:
0
AN:
316
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
AC:
0
AN:
67976
Other (OTH)
AF:
AC:
0
AN:
2092
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
DANN
Benign
PhyloP100
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at
Publications
You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.