rs6954833
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -12 ACMG points: 0P and 12B. BP4_StrongBA1
The NM_006060.6(IKZF1):c.716-981G>A variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.754 in 152,178 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 43,502 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar.
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.75 ( 43502 hom., cov: 33)
Consequence
IKZF1
NM_006060.6 intron
NM_006060.6 intron
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Not reported in ClinVar
Conservation
PhyloP100: -0.183
Genes affected
IKZF1 (HGNC:13176): (IKAROS family zinc finger 1) This gene encodes a transcription factor that belongs to the family of zinc-finger DNA-binding proteins associated with chromatin remodeling. The expression of this protein is restricted to the fetal and adult hemo-lymphopoietic system, and it functions as a regulator of lymphocyte differentiation. Several alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been described for this gene. Most isoforms share a common C-terminal domain, which contains two zinc finger motifs that are required for hetero- or homo-dimerization, and for interactions with other proteins. The isoforms, however, differ in the number of N-terminal zinc finger motifs that bind DNA and in nuclear localization signal presence, resulting in members with and without DNA-binding properties. Only a few isoforms contain the requisite three or more N-terminal zinc motifs that confer high affinity binding to a specific core DNA sequence element in the promoters of target genes. The non-DNA-binding isoforms are largely found in the cytoplasm, and are thought to function as dominant-negative factors. Overexpression of some dominant-negative isoforms have been associated with B-cell malignancies, such as acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). [provided by RefSeq, May 2014]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -12 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.91).
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AMR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.807 is higher than 0.05.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IKZF1 | NM_006060.6 | c.716-981G>A | intron_variant | ENST00000331340.8 | NP_006051.1 | |||
LOC124901631 | XR_007060322.1 | n.83-2169C>T | intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IKZF1 | ENST00000331340.8 | c.716-981G>A | intron_variant | 1 | NM_006060.6 | ENSP00000331614 | A1 | |||
ENST00000644669.1 | n.290-2169C>T | intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.754 AC: 114621AN: 152058Hom.: 43448 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
114621
AN:
152058
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
We have no GnomAD4 exomes data on this position. Probably position not covered by the project.
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.754 AC: 114734AN: 152178Hom.: 43502 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.753 AC XY: 56016AN XY: 74380
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
114734
AN:
152178
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
AC XY:
56016
AN XY:
74380
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
2169
AN:
3478
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at