Menu
GeneBe

rs6962

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The NM_004168.4(SDHA):c.1969G>A(p.Val657Ile) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.128 in 1,605,264 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 11,138 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. V657L) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.18 ( 2763 hom., cov: 34)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.12 ( 8375 hom. )

Consequence

SDHA
NM_004168.4 missense

Scores

2
12

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:11

Conservation

PhyloP100: 4.70
Variant links:
Genes affected
SDHA (HGNC:10680): (succinate dehydrogenase complex flavoprotein subunit A) This gene encodes a major catalytic subunit of succinate-ubiquinone oxidoreductase, a complex of the mitochondrial respiratory chain. The complex is composed of four nuclear-encoded subunits and is localized in the mitochondrial inner membrane. Mutations in this gene have been associated with a form of mitochondrial respiratory chain deficiency known as Leigh Syndrome. A pseudogene has been identified on chromosome 3q29. Alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jun 2014]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.011221588).
BP6
Variant 5-256394-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr5-256394-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 130279.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr5-256394-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.311 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
SDHANM_004168.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.1969G>A p.Val657Ile missense_variant 15/15 ENST00000264932.11

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
SDHAENST00000264932.11 linkuse as main transcriptc.1969G>A p.Val657Ile missense_variant 15/151 NM_004168.4 P1P31040-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.176
AC:
26620
AN:
151644
Hom.:
2756
Cov.:
34
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.316
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.296
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.179
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.156
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.0559
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.0850
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0812
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.152
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.120
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.177
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.131
AC:
32957
AN:
250898
Hom.:
2221
AF XY:
0.126
AC XY:
17130
AN XY:
135600
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.324
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.169
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.151
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0602
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.0879
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0855
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.123
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.131
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.123
AC:
178656
AN:
1453502
Hom.:
8375
Cov.:
35
AF XY:
0.121
AC XY:
87874
AN XY:
723584
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.308
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.163
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.153
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0476
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0871
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.0873
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.122
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.131
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.176
AC:
26650
AN:
151762
Hom.:
2763
Cov.:
34
AF XY:
0.170
AC XY:
12640
AN XY:
74186
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.316
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.178
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.156
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.0554
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.0855
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.0812
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.120
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.174
Alfa
AF:
0.112
Hom.:
433
Bravo
AF:
0.196
TwinsUK
AF:
0.128
AC:
474
ALSPAC
AF:
0.129
AC:
496
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.326
AC:
1438
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.130
AC:
1117
ExAC
AF:
0.131
AC:
15857
Asia WGS
AF:
0.0970
AC:
341
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.132
EpiControl
AF:
0.128

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:11
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Mitochondrial complex II deficiency, nuclear type 1 Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMendelicsMay 28, 2019- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesJan 03, 2020- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxMar 03, 2015- -
not specified Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingGenetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago-Likely benign based on allele frequency in 1000 Genomes Project or ESP global frequency and its presence in a patient with a rare or unrelated disease phenotype. NOT Sanger confirmed. -
Paragangliomas 5;C5700310:Mitochondrial complex II deficiency, nuclear type 1 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeFeb 01, 2024- -
Leigh syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsNov 18, 2014This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Paragangliomas 5 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingKCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control CenterJul 07, 2023- -
SDHA-related disorder Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact SciencesJun 02, 2022This variant is classified as benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -
Hereditary pheochromocytoma-paraganglioma Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.088
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.47
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.31
Cadd
Benign
16
Dann
Benign
0.72
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.24
T;T;.;.
Eigen
Benign
-0.51
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.46
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.94
D
LIST_S2
Benign
0.80
T;T;T;T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.011
T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-1.1
T
MutationTaster
Benign
0.000017
P;P;P
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.54
T
Sift4G
Benign
0.58
T;T;T;T
Polyphen
0.021, 0.013
.;B;B;.
Vest4
0.15
MPC
0.41
ClinPred
0.017
T
GERP RS
4.1
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.8
Varity_R
0.031
gMVP
0.50

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs6962; hg19: chr5-256509; COSMIC: COSV53765963; COSMIC: COSV53765963; API