rs7114549
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1
The NM_001292063.2(OTOG):āc.7062T>Cā(p.Ser2354=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0129 in 1,550,302 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 927 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (ā ā ).
Frequency
Genomes: š 0.037 ( 296 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes š: 0.010 ( 631 hom. )
Consequence
OTOG
NM_001292063.2 synonymous
NM_001292063.2 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -4.92
Genes affected
OTOG (HGNC:8516): (otogelin) The protein encoded by this gene is a component of the acellular membranes of the inner ear. Disruption of the orthologous mouse gene shows that it plays a role in auditory and vestibular functions. It is involved in fibrillar network organization, the anchoring of otoconial membranes and cupulae to the neuroepithelia, and likely in sound stimulation resistance. Mutations in this gene cause autosomal recessive nonsyndromic deafness, type 18B. Alternative splicing of this gene results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, May 2014]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.84).
BP6
Variant 11-17632216-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr11-17632216-T-C is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 226905.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-4.91 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.107 is higher than 0.05.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OTOG | NM_001292063.2 | c.7062T>C | p.Ser2354= | synonymous_variant | 42/56 | ENST00000399397.6 | |
OTOG | NM_001277269.2 | c.7098T>C | p.Ser2366= | synonymous_variant | 41/55 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OTOG | ENST00000399397.6 | c.7062T>C | p.Ser2354= | synonymous_variant | 42/56 | 5 | NM_001292063.2 | P2 | |
OTOG | ENST00000399391.7 | c.7098T>C | p.Ser2366= | synonymous_variant | 41/55 | 5 | A2 | ||
OTOG | ENST00000342528.2 | n.4400T>C | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 18/22 | 2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0368 AC: 5596AN: 152170Hom.: 296 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
5596
AN:
152170
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0219 AC: 3328AN: 151620Hom.: 134 AF XY: 0.0254 AC XY: 2056AN XY: 80982
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
3328
AN:
151620
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
2056
AN XY:
80982
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0103 AC: 14382AN: 1398014Hom.: 631 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0123 AC XY: 8453AN XY: 689386
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
14382
AN:
1398014
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
8453
AN XY:
689386
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0368 AC: 5608AN: 152288Hom.: 296 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0373 AC XY: 2778AN XY: 74448
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
5608
AN:
152288
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
2778
AN XY:
74448
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
220
AN:
3478
ClinVar
Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:6
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 26, 2024 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Athena Diagnostics | Nov 12, 2018 | - - |
not specified Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Oct 09, 2017 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | Nov 24, 2014 | Ser2366Ser in exon 41 of OTOG: This variant is not expected to have clinical sig nificance because it does not alter an amino acid residue and is not located wit hin the splice consensus sequence. It has been identified in 9.8% (19/194) of Lu hya (Kenyan) chromosomes from a broad population by the 1000 Genomes Project (ht tp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/projects/SNP; dbSNP rs7114549). - |
OTOG-related disorder Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Jun 15, 2019 | This variant is classified as benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at