rs7126177

Variant names:

• chr11-1759104-G-A
• rs7126177
• NM_001909.5:c.353-17C>T

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

• chr11-1759104-G-A
• chr11-1759104-G-C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_Strong BP6_Very_Strong BA1

The NM_001909.5(CTSD):​c.353-17C>T variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0116 in 1,576,698 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1,800 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

• Frequency:
  • Genomes: 𝑓 0.062 (953 hom., cov: 33)
  • Exomes 𝑓: 0.0062 (847 hom.)
• Consequence: CTSD NM_001909.5 intron
• Clinical Significance: Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:5
• Conservation: PhyloP100: -0.135

Genes affected

CTSD (HGNC:2529): (cathepsin D) This gene encodes a member of the A1 family of peptidases. The encoded preproprotein is proteolytically processed to generate multiple protein products. These products include the cathepsin D light and heavy chains, which heterodimerize to form the mature enzyme. This enzyme exhibits pepsin-like activity and plays a role in protein turnover and in the proteolytic activation of hormones and growth factors. Mutations in this gene play a causal role in neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis-10 and may be involved in the pathogenesis of several other diseases, including breast cancer and possibly Alzheimer's disease. [provided by RefSeq, Nov 2015]

ENSG00000250644 (HGNC:):

ACMG classification

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.

• BP4: Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.85).
• BP6: Variant 11-1759104-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr11-1759104-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 137054.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr11-1759104-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign].
• BA1: GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.211 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
CTSD	NM_001909.5	c.353-17C>T		intron_variant	Intron 3 of 8	ENST00000236671.7	NP_001900.1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
CTSD	ENST00000236671.7	c.353-17C>T		intron_variant	Intron 3 of 8	1	NM_001909.5	ENSP00000236671.2
ENSG00000250644	ENST00000636615.1	c.353-17C>T		intron_variant	Intron 3 of 9	5		ENSP00000490014.1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0617 AC: 9391 AN: 152174 Hom.: 951 Cov.: 33

Gnomad AFR AF: 0.215

Gnomad AMI AF: 0.00

Gnomad AMR AF: 0.0211

Gnomad ASJ AF: 0.00

Gnomad EAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad SAS AF: 0.000620

Gnomad FIN AF: 0.00

Gnomad MID AF: 0.0285

Gnomad NFE AF: 0.000823

Gnomad OTH AF: 0.0425

GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0156 AC: 3911 AN: 250584 Hom.: 382 AF XY: 0.0116 AC XY: 1577 AN XY: 135616

Gnomad AFR exome AF: 0.215

Gnomad AMR exome AF: 0.00919

Gnomad ASJ exome AF: 0.0000996

Gnomad EAS exome AF: 0.0000544

Gnomad SAS exome AF: 0.000163

Gnomad FIN exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad NFE exome AF: 0.000558

Gnomad OTH exome AF: 0.00654

GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00621 AC: 8844 AN: 1424406 Hom.: 847 Cov.: 27 AF XY: 0.00530 AC XY: 3769 AN XY: 710808

Gnomad4 AFR exome AF: 0.216

Gnomad4 AMR exome AF: 0.0111

Gnomad4 ASJ exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome AF: 0.000269

Gnomad4 FIN exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome AF: 0.000357

Gnomad4 OTH exome AF: 0.0137

GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0617 AC: 9399 AN: 152292 Hom.: 953 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0601 AC XY: 4473 AN XY: 74476

Gnomad4 AFR AF: 0.215

Gnomad4 AMR AF: 0.0210

Gnomad4 ASJ AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 EAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 SAS AF: 0.000414

Gnomad4 FIN AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 NFE AF: 0.000823

Gnomad4 OTH AF: 0.0421

Alfa AF: 0.00284 Hom.: 3

Bravo AF: 0.0699

Asia WGS AF: 0.0140 AC: 47 AN: 3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign

Submissions summary: Benign:5

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:2

Mar 06, 2012

GeneDx

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

-

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:2

Apr 25, 2017

Mayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo Clinic

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-

Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: not provided

- -

Neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis Benign:1

Feb 03, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
BayesDel_noAF	Benign	-0.85
CADD	Benign	3.1
DANN	Benign	0.67
RBP_binding_hub_radar		0.67
RBP_regulation_power_radar		1.8

Splicing

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)		0.0		Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs7126177; hg19: chr11-1780334;