rs71268283
- chr8-89784141-TAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA-T
- chr8-89784141-TAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA-TAA
- chr8-89784141-TAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA-TAAA
- chr8-89784141-TAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA-TAAAA
- chr8-89784141-TAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA-TAAAAA
- chr8-89784141-TAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA-TAAAAAA
- chr8-89784141-TAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA-TAAAAAAA
- chr8-89784141-TAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA-TAAAAAAAA
- chr8-89784141-TAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA-TAAAAAAAAA
- chr8-89784141-TAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA-TAAAAAAAAAA
- chr8-89784141-TAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA-TAAAAAAAAAAA
- chr8-89784141-TAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA-TAAAAAAAAAAAA
- chr8-89784141-TAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA-TAAAAAAAAAAAAA
- chr8-89784141-TAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA-TAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
- chr8-89784141-TAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA-TAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
- chr8-89784141-TAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA-TAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
- chr8-89784141-TAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA-TAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
- chr8-89784141-TAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA-TAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
- chr8-89784141-TAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA-TAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
- chr8-89784141-TAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA-TAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
- chr8-89784141-TAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA-TAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
- chr8-89784141-TAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA-TAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
- chr8-89784141-TAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA-TAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
- chr8-89784141-TAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA-TAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
- chr8-89784141-TAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA-TAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
- chr8-89784141-TAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA-TAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
- chr8-89784141-TAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA-TAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
- chr8-89784141-TAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA-TAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
- chr8-89784141-TAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA-TAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
- chr8-89784141-TAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA-TAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
- chr8-89784141-TAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA-TAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
- chr8-89784141-TAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA-TAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
- chr8-89784141-TAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA-TAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -4 ACMG points: 0P and 4B. BS2
The NM_003821.6(RIPK2):c.1029+10_1029+25delAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA variant causes a intron change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000752 in 558,334 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. It is difficult to determine the true allele frequency of this variant because it is of type DEL_BIG, and the frequency of such variant types in population databases may be underestimated and unreliable. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_003821.6 intron
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -4 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RIPK2 | NM_003821.6 | c.1029+10_1029+25delAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA | intron_variant | Intron 8 of 10 | ENST00000220751.5 | NP_003812.1 | ||
| RIPK2 | NM_001375360.1 | c.618+10_618+25delAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA | intron_variant | Intron 7 of 9 | NP_001362289.1 | |||
| RIPK2 | XM_011517357.3 | c.516+10_516+25delAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA | intron_variant | Intron 6 of 8 | XP_011515659.1 |
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000268 AC: 26AN: 97062Hom.: 0 Cov.: 0 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000347 AC: 16AN: 461264Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000292 AC XY: 7AN XY: 240056 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000268 AC: 26AN: 97070Hom.: 0 Cov.: 0 AF XY: 0.000249 AC XY: 11AN XY: 44206 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at