rs71524361
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2
The NM_006005.3(WFS1):c.1797C>A(p.Val599=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00196 in 1,614,162 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 54 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. V599V) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_006005.3 synonymous
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WFS1 | NM_006005.3 | c.1797C>A | p.Val599= | synonymous_variant | 8/8 | ENST00000226760.5 | |
WFS1 | NM_001145853.1 | c.1797C>A | p.Val599= | synonymous_variant | 8/8 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WFS1 | ENST00000226760.5 | c.1797C>A | p.Val599= | synonymous_variant | 8/8 | 1 | NM_006005.3 | P2 | |
ENST00000661896.1 | n.1337+2323G>T | intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes ? AF: 0.0101 AC: 1539AN: 152234Hom.: 27 Cov.: 34
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00255 AC: 640AN: 251414Hom.: 10 AF XY: 0.00196 AC XY: 266AN XY: 135894
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00111 AC: 1626AN: 1461810Hom.: 27 Cov.: 100 AF XY: 0.000987 AC XY: 718AN XY: 727216
GnomAD4 genome ? AF: 0.0101 AC: 1540AN: 152352Hom.: 27 Cov.: 34 AF XY: 0.00980 AC XY: 730AN XY: 74494
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | May 07, 2012 | Val599Val in Exon 08 of WFS1: This variant is not expected to have clinical sig nificance because it does not alter an amino acid residue, is not located within the splice consensus sequence, and has been identified in 3.3% (122/3738) of Af rican American chromosomes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (http://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS; dbSNP rs71524361). - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Apr 22, 2013 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC) | - | - - |
not provided Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Invitae | Jan 31, 2024 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Mar 23, 2022 | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
WFS1-Related Spectrum Disorders Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Type 2 diabetes mellitus;C1833021:Autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing loss 6;C3280358:Wolfram-like syndrome;C3805412:Cataract 41;C4551693:Wolfram syndrome 1 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics | Sep 27, 2021 | - - |
Autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing loss 6 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Wolfram syndrome 1 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | research | Clinical Genomics, Uppaluri K&H Personalized Medicine Clinic | - | Potent mutations in WFS1 gene are associated with Wolfram's syndrome, an autosomal recessive condition, which cause diabetes mellitus, diabetes insipidus, deafness and optic atrophy. However no sufficient evidence is found to ascertain the role of this particular variant rs71524361 in Wolfram's syndrome yet. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at