Menu
GeneBe

rs71524361

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_006005.3(WFS1):c.1797C>A(p.Val599=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00196 in 1,614,162 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 54 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. V599V) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.010 ( 27 hom., cov: 34)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0011 ( 27 hom. )

Consequence

WFS1
NM_006005.3 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:11

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.305
Variant links:
Genes affected
WFS1 (HGNC:12762): (wolframin ER transmembrane glycoprotein) This gene encodes a transmembrane protein, which is located primarily in the endoplasmic reticulum and ubiquitously expressed with highest levels in brain, pancreas, heart, and insulinoma beta-cell lines. Mutations in this gene are associated with Wolfram syndrome, also called DIDMOAD (Diabetes Insipidus, Diabetes Mellitus, Optic Atrophy, and Deafness), an autosomal recessive disorder. The disease affects the brain and central nervous system. Mutations in this gene can also cause autosomal dominant deafness 6 (DFNA6), also known as DFNA14 or DFNA38. Alternatively spliced transcript variants have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Mar 2009]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.54).
BP6
Variant 4-6301592-C-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr4-6301592-C-A is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 137915.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr4-6301592-C-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign]. Variant chr4-6301592-C-A is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.305 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.0101 (1540/152352) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.0347 (1444/41582). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0332. There are 27 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 730 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 34. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd at 27 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
WFS1NM_006005.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.1797C>A p.Val599= synonymous_variant 8/8 ENST00000226760.5
WFS1NM_001145853.1 linkuse as main transcriptc.1797C>A p.Val599= synonymous_variant 8/8

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
WFS1ENST00000226760.5 linkuse as main transcriptc.1797C>A p.Val599= synonymous_variant 8/81 NM_006005.3 P2
ENST00000661896.1 linkuse as main transcriptn.1337+2323G>T intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0101
AC:
1539
AN:
152234
Hom.:
27
Cov.:
34
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0348
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00458
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000118
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00860
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00255
AC:
640
AN:
251414
Hom.:
10
AF XY:
0.00196
AC XY:
266
AN XY:
135894
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0346
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00159
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.0000327
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000114
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00147
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00111
AC:
1626
AN:
1461810
Hom.:
27
Cov.:
100
AF XY:
0.000987
AC XY:
718
AN XY:
727216
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0383
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00195
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000580
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0000962
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00237
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0101
AC:
1540
AN:
152352
Hom.:
27
Cov.:
34
AF XY:
0.00980
AC XY:
730
AN XY:
74494
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0347
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00457
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.000118
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00851
Alfa
AF:
0.00315
Hom.:
3
Bravo
AF:
0.0115
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00289
AC:
10
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.000109
EpiControl
AF:
0.000119

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:11
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized MedicineMay 07, 2012Val599Val in Exon 08 of WFS1: This variant is not expected to have clinical sig nificance because it does not alter an amino acid residue, is not located within the splice consensus sequence, and has been identified in 3.3% (122/3738) of Af rican American chromosomes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (http://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS; dbSNP rs71524361). -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxApr 22, 2013This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingJoint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+-- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingLaboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)-- -
not provided Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeJan 31, 2024- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesMar 23, 2022- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center-- -
WFS1-Related Spectrum Disorders Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Type 2 diabetes mellitus;C1833021:Autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing loss 6;C3280358:Wolfram-like syndrome;C3805412:Cataract 41;C4551693:Wolfram syndrome 1 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingFulgent Genetics, Fulgent GeneticsSep 27, 2021- -
Autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing loss 6 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Wolfram syndrome 1 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterresearchClinical Genomics, Uppaluri K&H Personalized Medicine Clinic-Potent mutations in WFS1 gene are associated with Wolfram's syndrome, an autosomal recessive condition, which cause diabetes mellitus, diabetes insipidus, deafness and optic atrophy. However no sufficient evidence is found to ascertain the role of this particular variant rs71524361 in Wolfram's syndrome yet. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.54
Cadd
Benign
0.22
Dann
Benign
0.58

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs71524361; hg19: chr4-6303319; API