rs7182445
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -18 ACMG points: 0P and 18B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_152594.3(SPRED1):c.291G>A(p.Lys97=) variant causes a synonymous change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.882 in 1,613,722 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 630,054 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.82 ( 52438 hom., cov: 31)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.89 ( 577616 hom. )
Consequence
SPRED1
NM_152594.3 synonymous
NM_152594.3 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 3.71
Genes affected
SPRED1 (HGNC:20249): (sprouty related EVH1 domain containing 1) The protein encoded by this gene is a member of the Sprouty family of proteins and is phosphorylated by tyrosine kinase in response to several growth factors. The encoded protein can act as a homodimer or as a heterodimer with SPRED2 to regulate activation of the MAP kinase cascade. Defects in this gene are a cause of neurofibromatosis type 1-like syndrome (NFLS). [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -18 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.37).
BP6
Variant 15-38322324-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr15-38322324-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 41371.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr15-38322324-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (NFE) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.891 is higher than 0.05.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPRED1 | NM_152594.3 | c.291G>A | p.Lys97= | synonymous_variant | 3/7 | ENST00000299084.9 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPRED1 | ENST00000299084.9 | c.291G>A | p.Lys97= | synonymous_variant | 3/7 | 1 | NM_152594.3 | P1 | |
SPRED1 | ENST00000561317.1 | c.228G>A | p.Lys76= | synonymous_variant | 4/6 | 4 | |||
SPRED1 | ENST00000561205.1 | n.629G>A | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 3/5 | 5 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.824 AC: 125286AN: 151994Hom.: 52426 Cov.: 31
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
125286
AN:
151994
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.865 AC: 217376AN: 251190Hom.: 94735 AF XY: 0.873 AC XY: 118536AN XY: 135752
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
217376
AN:
251190
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
118536
AN XY:
135752
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.888 AC: 1297603AN: 1461610Hom.: 577616 Cov.: 53 AF XY: 0.889 AC XY: 646274AN XY: 727112
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
1297603
AN:
1461610
Hom.:
Cov.:
53
AF XY:
AC XY:
646274
AN XY:
727112
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.824 AC: 125349AN: 152112Hom.: 52438 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.826 AC XY: 61407AN XY: 74352
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
125349
AN:
152112
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
AC XY:
61407
AN XY:
74352
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
2766
AN:
3476
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:14Other:1
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
Legius syndrome Benign:6Other:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Nov 29, 2023 | - - |
not provided, no classification provided | literature only | GeneReviews | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center | Jul 07, 2023 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Invitae | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Jul 15, 2021 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
not specified Benign:5
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | Mar 14, 2012 | Lys97Lys in exon 3 of SPRED1: This variant is not expected to have clinical sign ificance because it does not alter an amino acid residue, is not located within the splice consensus sequence, and it has been identified in 90% (6302/7020) of European American chromosomes and 69% (2576/3738) of African American chromosome s from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (http://evs.gs.w ashington.edu/EVS/; dbSNP rs7182445). - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Sep 10, 2015 | - - |
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Apr 17, 2017 | Variant summary: The SPRED1 c.291G>A (p.Lys97Lys) variant involves the alteration of a conserved nucleotide, resulting in a synonymous change. One in silico tool predicts a polymorphism outcome for this variant. 5/5 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. ESE finder predicts loss of the SRp40 and SF2/ASF binding motifs. However, these predictions have yet to be confirmed by functional studies. The variant of interest has been found in a large, broad control population, ExAC in 104831/121368 control chromosomes (45684 homozygotes) at a frequency of 0.863745, which is approximately 345498 times the estimated maximal expected allele frequency of a pathogenic SPRED1 variant (0.0000025), suggesting this variant is likely a benign polymorphism. In addition, multiple clinical diagnostic laboratories/reputable databases classified this variant as benign. The variant of interest has not, to our knowledge, been reported in affected individuals via publications; nor evaluated for functional impact by in vivo/vitro studies. Taken together, this variant is classified as benign. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Mar 03, 2015 | - - |
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Apr 04, 2016 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at