rs7182445

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -18 ACMG points: 0P and 18B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The NM_152594.3(SPRED1):​c.291G>A​(p.Lys97=) variant causes a synonymous change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.882 in 1,613,722 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 630,054 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.82 ( 52438 hom., cov: 31)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.89 ( 577616 hom. )

Consequence

SPRED1
NM_152594.3 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:14O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 3.71
Variant links:
Genes affected
SPRED1 (HGNC:20249): (sprouty related EVH1 domain containing 1) The protein encoded by this gene is a member of the Sprouty family of proteins and is phosphorylated by tyrosine kinase in response to several growth factors. The encoded protein can act as a homodimer or as a heterodimer with SPRED2 to regulate activation of the MAP kinase cascade. Defects in this gene are a cause of neurofibromatosis type 1-like syndrome (NFLS). [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -18 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.37).
BP6
Variant 15-38322324-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr15-38322324-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 41371.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr15-38322324-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (NFE) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.891 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
SPRED1NM_152594.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.291G>A p.Lys97= synonymous_variant 3/7 ENST00000299084.9

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
SPRED1ENST00000299084.9 linkuse as main transcriptc.291G>A p.Lys97= synonymous_variant 3/71 NM_152594.3 P1
SPRED1ENST00000561317.1 linkuse as main transcriptc.228G>A p.Lys76= synonymous_variant 4/64
SPRED1ENST00000561205.1 linkuse as main transcriptn.629G>A non_coding_transcript_exon_variant 3/55

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.824
AC:
125286
AN:
151994
Hom.:
52426
Cov.:
31
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.664
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.747
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.841
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.902
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.792
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.878
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.933
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.832
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.897
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.829
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.865
AC:
217376
AN:
251190
Hom.:
94735
AF XY:
0.873
AC XY:
118536
AN XY:
135752
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.654
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.826
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.908
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.790
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.891
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.934
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.896
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.871
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.888
AC:
1297603
AN:
1461610
Hom.:
577616
Cov.:
53
AF XY:
0.889
AC XY:
646274
AN XY:
727112
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.646
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.832
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.907
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.784
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.892
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.933
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.899
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.875
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.824
AC:
125349
AN:
152112
Hom.:
52438
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.826
AC XY:
61407
AN XY:
74352
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.664
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.841
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.902
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.792
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.878
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.933
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.896
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.822
Alfa
AF:
0.876
Hom.:
108593
Bravo
AF:
0.806
Asia WGS
AF:
0.795
AC:
2766
AN:
3476
EpiCase
AF:
0.889
EpiControl
AF:
0.886

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:14Other:1
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Legius syndrome Benign:6Other:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesNov 29, 2023- -
not provided, no classification providedliterature onlyGeneReviews-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingKCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control CenterJul 07, 2023- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeFeb 01, 2024- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome-Nilou LabJul 15, 2021- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDiagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
not specified Benign:5
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized MedicineMar 14, 2012Lys97Lys in exon 3 of SPRED1: This variant is not expected to have clinical sign ificance because it does not alter an amino acid residue, is not located within the splice consensus sequence, and it has been identified in 90% (6302/7020) of European American chromosomes and 69% (2576/3738) of African American chromosome s from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (http://evs.gs.w ashington.edu/EVS/; dbSNP rs7182445). -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingJoint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+-- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)Sep 10, 2015- -
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpApr 17, 2017Variant summary: The SPRED1 c.291G>A (p.Lys97Lys) variant involves the alteration of a conserved nucleotide, resulting in a synonymous change. One in silico tool predicts a polymorphism outcome for this variant. 5/5 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. ESE finder predicts loss of the SRp40 and SF2/ASF binding motifs. However, these predictions have yet to be confirmed by functional studies. The variant of interest has been found in a large, broad control population, ExAC in 104831/121368 control chromosomes (45684 homozygotes) at a frequency of 0.863745, which is approximately 345498 times the estimated maximal expected allele frequency of a pathogenic SPRED1 variant (0.0000025), suggesting this variant is likely a benign polymorphism. In addition, multiple clinical diagnostic laboratories/reputable databases classified this variant as benign. The variant of interest has not, to our knowledge, been reported in affected individuals via publications; nor evaluated for functional impact by in vivo/vitro studies. Taken together, this variant is classified as benign. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxMar 03, 2015- -
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsApr 04, 2016This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.37
CADD
Benign
10
DANN
Benign
0.66

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs7182445; hg19: chr15-38614525; COSMIC: COSV54434943; API