rs71873106

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -16 ACMG points: 0P and 16B. BP6_Very_StrongBA1

The ENST00000379079.8(WT1):c.-8_-7delGC variant causes a 5 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00396 in 1,608,994 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 225 homozygotes. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.021 ( 114 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.0022 ( 111 hom. )

Consequence

WT1
ENST00000379079.8 5_prime_UTR

Scores

Not classified

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:9

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.880

Publications

0 publications found

Variant links:

COSMIC-nc: COSV104651942

Genes affected

WT1 (HGNC:12796): (WT1 transcription factor) This gene encodes a transcription factor that contains four zinc-finger motifs at the C-terminus and a proline/glutamine-rich DNA-binding domain at the N-terminus. It has an essential role in the normal development of the urogenital system, and it is mutated in a small subset of patients with Wilms tumor. This gene exhibits complex tissue-specific and polymorphic imprinting pattern, with biallelic, and monoallelic expression from the maternal and paternal alleles in different tissues. Multiple transcript variants have been described. In several variants, there is evidence for the use of a non-AUG (CUG) translation initiation codon upstream of, and in-frame with the first AUG. Authors of PMID:7926762 also provide evidence that WT1 mRNA undergoes RNA editing in human and rat, and that this process is tissue-restricted and developmentally regulated. [provided by RefSeq, Mar 2015]

WT1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

Denys-Drash syndrome
Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen, G2P
Wilms tumor 1
Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: ClinGen, G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
familial idiopathic steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome
Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Frasier syndrome
Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

WT1 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -16 ACMG points.

BP6

Variant 11-32430545-AGC-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr11-32430545-AGC-A is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 257619.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.

BA1

GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.0718 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
WT1	NM_024426.6 link	c.662-1928_662-1927delGC		intron_variant	Intron 1 of 9	ENST00000452863.10	NP_077744.4	P19544-7Q6PI38

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
WT1	ENST00000452863.10 link	c.662-1928_662-1927delGC		intron_variant	Intron 1 of 9	1	NM_024426.6	ENSP00000415516.5		P19544-7A0A0A0MT54

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.0210

AC:

3139

AN:

149700

Hom.:

114

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0742

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00628

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.000418

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.000195

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00325

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000236

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.0224

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.00476

AC:

1138

AN:

239094

AF XY:

0.00356

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.0702

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00344

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.000304

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.0000938

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.000198

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00271

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.00221

AC:

3232

AN:

1459184

Hom.:

111

AF XY:

0.00196

AC XY:

1420

AN XY:

725746

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0772

AC:

2578

AN:

33406

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00426

AC:

190

AN:

44646

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.000153

AC:

AN:

26092

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

39632

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.000128

AC:

AN:

85824

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.0000768

AC:

AN:

52082

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00278

AC:

AN:

5764

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.000143

AC:

159

AN:

1111442

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00448

AC:

270

AN:

60296

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.447

Heterozygous variant carriers

156

312

467

623

779

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Exome Hom

Variant carriers

168

252

336

420

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.0210

AC:

3139

AN:

149810

Hom.:

114

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0206

AC XY:

1505

AN XY:

73190

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0741

AC:

2979

AN:

40224

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00627

AC:

AN:

14984

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3470

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4992

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.000209

AC:

AN:

4776

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.000195

AC:

AN:

10260

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00342

AC:

AN:

292

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.000236

AC:

AN:

67824

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.0221

AC:

AN:

2078

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.495

Heterozygous variant carriers

140

281

421

562

702

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Genome Hom

Variant carriers

128

160

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.0102

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.0236

Asia WGS

AF:

0.00318

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.000273

EpiControl

AF:

0.000119

ClinVar

Significance: Benign

Submissions summary: Benign:9

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified

Benign:2

Mar 04, 2025

Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided

Benign:2

Feb 28, 2019

GeneDx

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Nov 29, 2023

ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Frasier syndrome

Benign:1

Dec 05, 2021

Genome-Nilou Lab

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Meacham syndrome

Benign:1

Dec 05, 2021

Genome-Nilou Lab

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Nephrotic syndrome, type 4

Benign:1

Dec 05, 2021

Genome-Nilou Lab

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Drash syndrome

Benign:1

Dec 05, 2021

Genome-Nilou Lab

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Wilms tumor 1

Benign:1

Dec 05, 2021

Genome-Nilou Lab

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

PhyloP100

0.88

Mutation Taster

=297/3

polymorphism (auto)

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.020

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over