rs719201

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The NM_001267550.2(TTN):​c.4480+6C>T variant causes a splice region, intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.977 in 1,613,998 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 771,242 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 3/3 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.94 ( 67972 hom., cov: 34)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.98 ( 703270 hom. )

Consequence

TTN
NM_001267550.2 splice_region, intron

Scores

2
Splicing: ADA: 0.00001651
2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:23

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.0340

Publications

14 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
TTN (HGNC:12403): (titin) This gene encodes a large abundant protein of striated muscle. The product of this gene is divided into two regions, a N-terminal I-band and a C-terminal A-band. The I-band, which is the elastic part of the molecule, contains two regions of tandem immunoglobulin domains on either side of a PEVK region that is rich in proline, glutamate, valine and lysine. The A-band, which is thought to act as a protein-ruler, contains a mixture of immunoglobulin and fibronectin repeats, and possesses kinase activity. An N-terminal Z-disc region and a C-terminal M-line region bind to the Z-line and M-line of the sarcomere, respectively, so that a single titin molecule spans half the length of a sarcomere. Titin also contains binding sites for muscle associated proteins so it serves as an adhesion template for the assembly of contractile machinery in muscle cells. It has also been identified as a structural protein for chromosomes. Alternative splicing of this gene results in multiple transcript variants. Considerable variability exists in the I-band, the M-line and the Z-disc regions of titin. Variability in the I-band region contributes to the differences in elasticity of different titin isoforms and, therefore, to the differences in elasticity of different muscle types. Mutations in this gene are associated with familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy 9, and autoantibodies to titin are produced in patients with the autoimmune disease scleroderma. [provided by RefSeq, Feb 2012]
TTN-AS1 (HGNC:44124): (TTN antisense RNA 1) This gene encodes a non-coding RNA transcribed from the opposite strand to the titin gene. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2016]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.81).
BP6
Variant 2-178777698-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-178777698-G-A is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 47063.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (NFE) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.985 is higher than 0.05.

Variant Effect in Transcripts

ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_001267550.2. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.

RefSeq Transcripts

Selected
GeneTranscriptTagsHGVScHGVSpEffectExon RankProteinUniProt
TTN
NM_001267550.2
MANE Select
c.4480+6C>T
splice_region intron
N/ANP_001254479.2
LOC101927055
NR_120594.1
n.773G>A
non_coding_transcript_exon
Exon 1 of 2
TTN
NM_001256850.1
c.4480+6C>T
splice_region intron
N/ANP_001243779.1

Ensembl Transcripts

Selected
GeneTranscriptTagsHGVScHGVSpEffectExon RankProteinUniProt
TTN
ENST00000589042.5
TSL:5 MANE Select
c.4480+6C>T
splice_region intron
N/AENSP00000467141.1
TTN
ENST00000446966.2
TSL:1
c.4480+6C>T
splice_region intron
N/AENSP00000408004.2
TTN
ENST00000436599.2
TSL:1
c.4204+6C>T
splice_region intron
N/AENSP00000405517.2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.943
AC:
143495
AN:
152188
Hom.:
67946
Cov.:
34
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.852
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.843
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.963
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.994
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.873
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.952
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.980
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.978
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.991
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.946
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.961
AC:
240922
AN:
250802
AF XY:
0.965
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.853
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.938
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.992
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.881
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.978
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.990
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.969
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.980
AC:
1433037
AN:
1461692
Hom.:
703270
Cov.:
74
AF XY:
0.980
AC XY:
712914
AN XY:
727158
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.843
AC:
28209
AN:
33464
American (AMR)
AF:
0.942
AC:
42137
AN:
44718
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.993
AC:
25937
AN:
26126
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.870
AC:
34508
AN:
39674
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.958
AC:
82659
AN:
86250
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.977
AC:
52168
AN:
53380
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.984
AC:
5671
AN:
5766
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.992
AC:
1103196
AN:
1111924
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.970
AC:
58552
AN:
60390
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.479
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1732
3465
5197
6930
8662
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
21656
43312
64968
86624
108280
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.943
AC:
143572
AN:
152306
Hom.:
67972
Cov.:
34
AF XY:
0.942
AC XY:
70184
AN XY:
74468
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.851
AC:
35365
AN:
41542
American (AMR)
AF:
0.963
AC:
14728
AN:
15300
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.994
AC:
3451
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.872
AC:
4523
AN:
5184
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.951
AC:
4589
AN:
4824
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.980
AC:
10407
AN:
10618
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.976
AC:
287
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.991
AC:
67451
AN:
68044
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.946
AC:
2002
AN:
2116
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.506
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
402
803
1205
1606
2008
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
910
1820
2730
3640
4550
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.975
Hom.:
107387
Bravo
AF:
0.934
Asia WGS
AF:
0.905
AC:
3149
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.991
EpiControl
AF:
0.991

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:23
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:11
Jul 23, 2013
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Aug 09, 2019
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Aug 15, 2013
Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Sep 16, 2011
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Apr 09, 2025
Molecular Diagnostic Laboratory for Inherited Cardiovascular Disease, Montreal Heart Institute
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Nov 01, 2012
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease.

Autosomal recessive limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 2J Benign:2
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease.

Sep 10, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Early-onset myopathy with fatal cardiomyopathy Benign:2
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease.

Sep 10, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

not provided Benign:2
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

Jan 15, 2019
Athena Diagnostics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Myopathy, myofibrillar, 9, with early respiratory failure Benign:2
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease.

Sep 10, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Tibial muscular dystrophy Benign:2
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease.

Sep 10, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Autosomal recessive limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 2J;C1858763:Dilated cardiomyopathy 1G Benign:1
Feb 04, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Dilated cardiomyopathy 1G Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease.

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.9

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.81
CADD
Benign
5.2
DANN
Benign
0.69
PhyloP100
-0.034
Mutation Taster
=94/6
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
dbscSNV1_ADA
Benign
0.000017
dbscSNV1_RF
Benign
0.0
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs719201; hg19: chr2-179642425; API