rs722575
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -3 ACMG points: 0P and 3B. BP4_ModerateBP7
The NM_173489.5(MROH2B):c.4677G>T(p.Pro1559Pro) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000273 in 1,610,450 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_173489.5 synonymous
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- complement component 7 deficiencyInheritance: AR Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Illumina, Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -3 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_173489.5. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MROH2B | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.4677G>T | p.Pro1559Pro | synonymous | Exon 42 of 42 | ENSP00000382476.4 | Q7Z745-1 | ||
| MROH2B | TSL:1 | n.484G>T | non_coding_transcript_exon | Exon 3 of 3 | |||||
| MROH2B | TSL:2 | c.3342G>T | p.Pro1114Pro | synonymous | Exon 32 of 32 | ENSP00000441504.1 | F5GZ06 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000658 AC: 10AN: 151982Hom.: 1 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0000812 AC: 20AN: 246424 AF XY: 0.0000748 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000233 AC: 34AN: 1458468Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0000220 AC XY: 16AN XY: 725668 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000658 AC: 10AN: 151982Hom.: 1 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000943 AC XY: 7AN XY: 74212 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at