rs7250822
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -7 ACMG points: 1P and 8B. PVS1_SupportingBA1
The NM_144616.4(JSRP1):c.3G>C(p.Met1?) variant causes a start lost change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0569 in 1,605,768 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 9,892 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_144616.4 start_lost
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -7 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_144616.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JSRP1 | NM_144616.4 | MANE Select | c.3G>C | p.Met1? | start_lost | Exon 2 of 7 | NP_653217.1 |
Ensembl Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JSRP1 | ENST00000300961.10 | TSL:2 MANE Select | c.3G>C | p.Met1? | start_lost | Exon 2 of 7 | ENSP00000300961.4 | ||
| JSRP1 | ENST00000593238.2 | TSL:5 | n.459G>C | non_coding_transcript_exon | Exon 2 of 5 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.155 AC: 23626AN: 152060Hom.: 4183 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0883 AC: 21554AN: 244088 AF XY: 0.0805 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0466 AC: 67725AN: 1453590Hom.: 5703 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.0468 AC XY: 33839AN XY: 723100 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.156 AC: 23674AN: 152178Hom.: 4189 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.155 AC XY: 11561AN XY: 74418 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at