rs72624957

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -14 ACMG points: 0P and 14B. BP4_StrongBP6BP7BS1BS2

The NM_000883.4(IMPDH1):c.888C>T(p.Ile296Ile) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000244 in 1,612,780 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00030 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00024 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

IMPDH1
NM_000883.4 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:2B:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.504

Publications

1 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

IMPDH1 (HGNC:6052): (inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase 1) The protein encoded by this gene acts as a homotetramer to regulate cell growth. The encoded protein is an enzyme that catalyzes the synthesis of xanthine monophosphate (XMP) from inosine-5'-monophosphate (IMP). This is the rate-limiting step in the de novo synthesis of guanine nucleotides. Defects in this gene are a cause of retinitis pigmentosa type 10 (RP10). Several transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Dec 2008]

IMPDH1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

inherited retinal dystrophy
Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
Leber congenital amaurosis 11
Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, LIMITED Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P
retinitis pigmentosa 10
Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
Leber congenital amaurosis
Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
retinitis pigmentosa
Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

IMPDH1 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -14 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.47).

BP6

Variant 7-128398600-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr7-128398600-G-A is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 358877.

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.504 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population mid. GnomAdExome4 allele frequency = 0.000238 (348/1460452) while in subpopulation MID AF = 0.00503 (29/5764). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0036. There are 0 homozygotes in GnomAdExome4. There are 167 alleles in the male GnomAdExome4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 31. This position passed quality control check.

BS2

High AC in GnomAd4 at 46 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
IMPDH1	NM_000883.4 link	c.888C>T	p.Ile296Ile	synonymous_variant	Exon 10 of 17	ENST00000338791.11	NP_000874.2	P20839-6B3KRZ3

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
IMPDH1	ENST00000338791.11 link	c.888C>T	p.Ile296Ile	synonymous_variant	Exon 10 of 17	2	NM_000883.4	ENSP00000345096.6		P20839-6

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000302

AC:

AN:

152210

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.000531

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000327

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.000385

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.000207

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000176

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00191

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.000215

AC:

AN:

250914

AF XY:

0.000199

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.000435

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000318

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.0000993

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.000163

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.0000463

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.000229

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000326

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000238

AC:

348

AN:

1460452

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000230

AC XY:

167

AN XY:

726340

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.000598

AC:

AN:

33454

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000291

AC:

AN:

44698

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.000115

AC:

AN:

26132

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.000101

AC:

AN:

39666

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.0000696

AC:

AN:

86226

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.0000188

AC:

AN:

53150

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00503

AC:

AN:

5764

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.000221

AC:

245

AN:

1111012

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000447

AC:

AN:

60350

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.454

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000302

AC:

AN:

152328

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000269

AC XY:

AN XY:

74486

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.000553

AC:

AN:

41576

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000327

AC:

AN:

15304

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3472

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.000386

AC:

AN:

5182

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.000207

AC:

AN:

4824

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10620

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.000176

AC:

AN:

68032

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00142

AC:

AN:

2112

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.499

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.000306

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000419

Asia WGS

AF:

0.00173

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.000436

EpiControl

AF:

0.000119

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:1

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Leber congenital amaurosis 11

Uncertain:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Retinitis pigmentosa

Uncertain:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

not provided

Benign:1

Jan 27, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.47

CADD

Benign

7.9

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.86

PhyloP100

-0.50

Mutation Taster

=98/2

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over