rs72648270

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The NM_001267550.2(TTN):​c.98164A>T​(p.Ile32722Phe) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0217 in 1,613,844 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 923 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 11/19 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. I32722L) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.018 ( 71 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.022 ( 852 hom. )

Consequence

TTN
NM_001267550.2 missense

Scores

7
9

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:21

Conservation

PhyloP100: 3.40

Publications

21 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
TTN (HGNC:12403): (titin) This gene encodes a large abundant protein of striated muscle. The product of this gene is divided into two regions, a N-terminal I-band and a C-terminal A-band. The I-band, which is the elastic part of the molecule, contains two regions of tandem immunoglobulin domains on either side of a PEVK region that is rich in proline, glutamate, valine and lysine. The A-band, which is thought to act as a protein-ruler, contains a mixture of immunoglobulin and fibronectin repeats, and possesses kinase activity. An N-terminal Z-disc region and a C-terminal M-line region bind to the Z-line and M-line of the sarcomere, respectively, so that a single titin molecule spans half the length of a sarcomere. Titin also contains binding sites for muscle associated proteins so it serves as an adhesion template for the assembly of contractile machinery in muscle cells. It has also been identified as a structural protein for chromosomes. Alternative splicing of this gene results in multiple transcript variants. Considerable variability exists in the I-band, the M-line and the Z-disc regions of titin. Variability in the I-band region contributes to the differences in elasticity of different titin isoforms and, therefore, to the differences in elasticity of different muscle types. Mutations in this gene are associated with familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy 9, and autoantibodies to titin are produced in patients with the autoimmune disease scleroderma. [provided by RefSeq, Feb 2012]
TTN-AS1 (HGNC:44124): (TTN antisense RNA 1) This gene encodes a non-coding RNA transcribed from the opposite strand to the titin gene. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2016]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.0017301738).
BP6
Variant 2-178539901-T-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-178539901-T-A is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 47595.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (EAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.137 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
TTNNM_001267550.2 linkc.98164A>T p.Ile32722Phe missense_variant Exon 352 of 363 ENST00000589042.5 NP_001254479.2 A0A0A0MTS7

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
TTNENST00000589042.5 linkc.98164A>T p.Ile32722Phe missense_variant Exon 352 of 363 5 NM_001267550.2 ENSP00000467141.1 A0A0A0MTS7

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0185
AC:
2815
AN:
152174
Hom.:
72
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00437
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00439
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0274
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.0236
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.146
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.0124
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00160
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.0506
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0177
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0353
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.0268
AC:
6668
AN:
248794
AF XY:
0.0264
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00362
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0261
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0221
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.157
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00339
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0178
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.0290
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0220
AC:
32195
AN:
1461552
Hom.:
852
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.0217
AC XY:
15801
AN XY:
727068
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00406
AC:
136
AN:
33472
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0271
AC:
1213
AN:
44718
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0227
AC:
593
AN:
26130
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.164
AC:
6508
AN:
39692
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0133
AC:
1149
AN:
86258
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00313
AC:
167
AN:
53394
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0761
AC:
439
AN:
5766
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0184
AC:
20484
AN:
1111758
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0249
AC:
1506
AN:
60364
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.482
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1846
3692
5539
7385
9231
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
858
1716
2574
3432
4290
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0185
AC:
2812
AN:
152292
Hom.:
71
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.0185
AC XY:
1381
AN XY:
74466
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00435
AC:
181
AN:
41578
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0275
AC:
420
AN:
15294
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0236
AC:
82
AN:
3468
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.146
AC:
753
AN:
5164
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0126
AC:
61
AN:
4832
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00160
AC:
17
AN:
10620
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0544
AC:
16
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0177
AC:
1205
AN:
68014
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0345
AC:
73
AN:
2116
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.499
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
137
274
411
548
685
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
40
80
120
160
200
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.0224
Hom.:
67
Bravo
AF:
0.0205
TwinsUK
AF:
0.0181
AC:
67
ALSPAC
AF:
0.0179
AC:
69
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00384
AC:
15
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.0170
AC:
141
ExAC
AF:
0.0251
AC:
3031
Asia WGS
AF:
0.0570
AC:
199
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.0227
EpiControl
AF:
0.0248

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:21
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:8
Apr 09, 2025
Molecular Diagnostic Laboratory for Inherited Cardiovascular Disease, Montreal Heart Institute
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Oct 31, 2012
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

-
Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

May 22, 2012
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jun 24, 2013
Biesecker Lab/Clinical Genomics Section, National Institutes of Health
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:research

- -

-
Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Likely benign based on allele frequency in 1000 Genomes Project or ESP global frequency and its presence in a patient with a rare or unrelated disease phenotype. NOT Sanger confirmed. -

-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 06, 2020
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Autosomal recessive limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 2J Benign:2
Sep 10, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Early-onset myopathy with fatal cardiomyopathy Benign:2
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Sep 10, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:2
-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

-
Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Tibial muscular dystrophy Benign:2
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Sep 10, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Myopathy, myofibrillar, 9, with early respiratory failure Benign:2
Sep 10, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Autosomal recessive limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 2J;C1858763:Dilated cardiomyopathy 1G Benign:1
Feb 04, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Dilated cardiomyopathy 1G Benign:1
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Jan 16, 2013
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Uncertain
0.47
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.51
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.36
CADD
Benign
19
DANN
Benign
0.83
Eigen
Uncertain
0.64
Eigen_PC
Uncertain
0.66
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.91
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
0.94
D;D;D;.;D;D;D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0017
T;T;T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-1.2
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
1.4
.;.;.;L;.;.;L
PhyloP100
3.4
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.62
T
PROVEAN
Uncertain
-2.8
D;N;.;.;N;N;.
REVEL
Benign
0.18
Sift
Benign
0.18
T;T;.;.;T;T;.
Polyphen
1.0
.;.;.;D;.;.;D
Vest4
0.41
MPC
0.54
ClinPred
0.024
T
GERP RS
6.2
Mutation Taster
=89/11
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs72648270; hg19: chr2-179404628; COSMIC: COSV104640888; COSMIC: COSV104640888; API