rs72648972

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_001267550.2(TTN):​c.23232C>G​(p.Asn7744Lys) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00252 in 1,613,528 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 41 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 11/17 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0020 ( 1 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0026 ( 40 hom. )

Consequence

TTN
NM_001267550.2 missense

Scores

4
11

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:22

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.59
Variant links:
Genes affected
TTN (HGNC:12403): (titin) This gene encodes a large abundant protein of striated muscle. The product of this gene is divided into two regions, a N-terminal I-band and a C-terminal A-band. The I-band, which is the elastic part of the molecule, contains two regions of tandem immunoglobulin domains on either side of a PEVK region that is rich in proline, glutamate, valine and lysine. The A-band, which is thought to act as a protein-ruler, contains a mixture of immunoglobulin and fibronectin repeats, and possesses kinase activity. An N-terminal Z-disc region and a C-terminal M-line region bind to the Z-line and M-line of the sarcomere, respectively, so that a single titin molecule spans half the length of a sarcomere. Titin also contains binding sites for muscle associated proteins so it serves as an adhesion template for the assembly of contractile machinery in muscle cells. It has also been identified as a structural protein for chromosomes. Alternative splicing of this gene results in multiple transcript variants. Considerable variability exists in the I-band, the M-line and the Z-disc regions of titin. Variability in the I-band region contributes to the differences in elasticity of different titin isoforms and, therefore, to the differences in elasticity of different muscle types. Mutations in this gene are associated with familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy 9, and autoantibodies to titin are produced in patients with the autoimmune disease scleroderma. [provided by RefSeq, Feb 2012]
TTN-AS1 (HGNC:44124): (TTN antisense RNA 1) This gene encodes a non-coding RNA transcribed from the opposite strand to the titin gene. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2016]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.005209595).
BP6
Variant 2-178720530-G-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-178720530-G-C is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 46715.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr2-178720530-G-C is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population sas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00199 (303/152256) while in subpopulation SAS AF= 0.0164 (79/4810). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0135. There are 1 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 167 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 40 AD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
TTNNM_001267550.2 linkc.23232C>G p.Asn7744Lys missense_variant Exon 80 of 363 ENST00000589042.5 NP_001254479.2 A0A0A0MTS7

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
TTNENST00000589042.5 linkc.23232C>G p.Asn7744Lys missense_variant Exon 80 of 363 5 NM_001267550.2 ENSP00000467141.1 A0A0A0MTS7

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00198
AC:
301
AN:
152138
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000724
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00439
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00125
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00950
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.000772
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.0162
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.000471
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00633
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00175
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00334
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00407
AC:
1011
AN:
248324
Hom.:
16
AF XY:
0.00485
AC XY:
653
AN XY:
134722
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000711
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00122
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0102
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.000837
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.0189
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.000139
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00207
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00449
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00258
AC:
3765
AN:
1461272
Hom.:
40
Cov.:
35
AF XY:
0.00310
AC XY:
2253
AN XY:
726902
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.000688
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00128
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00999
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.000630
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0183
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.000206
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00137
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00331
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00199
AC:
303
AN:
152256
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00224
AC XY:
167
AN XY:
74448
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.000722
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00124
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00950
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.000774
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.0164
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.000471
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00175
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00378
Alfa
AF:
0.00242
Hom.:
1
Bravo
AF:
0.00161
TwinsUK
AF:
0.00216
AC:
8
ALSPAC
AF:
0.000259
AC:
1
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.000274
AC:
1
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00209
AC:
17
ExAC
AF:
0.00436
AC:
526
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00462
AC:
16
AN:
3476
EpiCase
AF:
0.00186
EpiControl
AF:
0.00243

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:22
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:7
-
Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center
Significance: Benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jun 21, 2016
GeneDx
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Nov 09, 2020
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance: Benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-
Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+
Significance: Benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Feb 14, 2012
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

Asn6500Lys in exon 77 of TTN: This variant is has been identified in 0.2% (16/65 32) of European American chromosomes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (http://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS; dbSNP rs72648972). Asn650 0Lys in exon 77 of TTN (rs72648972; allele frequency = 0.2%, 16/6532) ** -

Jun 10, 2015
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Autosomal recessive limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 2J Benign:2
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Sep 10, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Early-onset myopathy with fatal cardiomyopathy Benign:2
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Sep 10, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:2
-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: not provided

- -

Jun 24, 2013
Biesecker Lab/Clinical Genomics Section, National Institutes of Health
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: research

- -

Tibial muscular dystrophy Benign:2
Sep 10, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Myopathy, myofibrillar, 9, with early respiratory failure Benign:2
Sep 10, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Autosomal recessive limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 2J;C1858763:Dilated cardiomyopathy 1G Benign:1
Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Dilated cardiomyopathy 1G Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Cardiomyopathy Benign:1
Nov 03, 2017
CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy Benign:1
Jun 15, 2018
Center for Advanced Laboratory Medicine, UC San Diego Health, University of California San Diego
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Feb 10, 2016
Ambry Genetics
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Uncertain
0.44
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.55
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.54
CADD
Benign
18
DANN
Uncertain
0.98
Eigen
Benign
-0.13
Eigen_PC
Benign
0.044
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.91
D
LIST_S2
Benign
0.59
T;T;.;T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0052
T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.87
T
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.52
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-1.1
N;.;.;.
REVEL
Benign
0.14
Sift
Benign
0.65
T;.;.;.
Polyphen
0.0
.;.;B;B
Vest4
0.17
MutPred
0.59
.;.;Gain of methylation at N7427 (P = 0.0259);Gain of methylation at N7427 (P = 0.0259);
MVP
0.23
MPC
0.096
ClinPred
0.012
T
GERP RS
4.9

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs72648972; hg19: chr2-179585257; API