rs72650053
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_001267550.2(TTN):c.36625G>T(p.Val12209Leu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0107 in 1,588,700 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1,337 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 11/14 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. V12209V) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001267550.2 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_001267550.2. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TTN | TSL:5 MANE Select | c.36625G>T | p.Val12209Leu | missense | Exon 173 of 363 | ENSP00000467141.1 | Q8WZ42-12 | ||
| TTN | TSL:1 | c.36625G>T | p.Val12209Leu | missense | Exon 173 of 361 | ENSP00000408004.2 | A0A1B0GXE3 | ||
| TTN | TSL:1 | c.36349G>T | p.Val12117Leu | missense | Exon 171 of 361 | ENSP00000405517.2 | A0A0C4DG59 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0142 AC: 2075AN: 146308Hom.: 56 Cov.: 29 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0234 AC: 5452AN: 232644 AF XY: 0.0239 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0103 AC: 14884AN: 1442274Hom.: 1280 Cov.: 34 AF XY: 0.0113 AC XY: 8135AN XY: 716784 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0142 AC: 2084AN: 146426Hom.: 57 Cov.: 29 AF XY: 0.0158 AC XY: 1126AN XY: 71140 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at