rs72653789
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely pathogenic. Variant got 9 ACMG points: 9P and 0B. PM1PM2PP3_StrongPP5
The ENST00000205557.12(ABCC6):c.2297C>A(p.Ala766Asp) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant was absent in control chromosomes in GnomAD project. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Pathogenic (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. A766V) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
ENST00000205557.12 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_pathogenic. Variant got 9 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ABCC6 | NM_001171.6 | c.2297C>A | p.Ala766Asp | missense_variant | 18/31 | ENST00000205557.12 | NP_001162.5 | |
ABCC6 | NM_001351800.1 | c.1955C>A | p.Ala652Asp | missense_variant | 18/31 | NP_001338729.1 | ||
ABCC6 | NR_147784.1 | n.2334C>A | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 18/29 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ABCC6 | ENST00000205557.12 | c.2297C>A | p.Ala766Asp | missense_variant | 18/31 | 1 | NM_001171.6 | ENSP00000205557 | P1 | |
ABCC6 | ENST00000622290.5 | c.2297C>A | p.Ala766Asp | missense_variant, NMD_transcript_variant | 18/32 | 5 | ENSP00000483331 | |||
ABCC6 | ENST00000456970.6 | c.2297C>A | p.Ala766Asp | missense_variant, NMD_transcript_variant | 18/29 | 2 | ENSP00000405002 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 33
GnomAD4 exome Cov.: 36
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 33
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Autosomal recessive inherited pseudoxanthoma elasticum Pathogenic:1
Pathogenic, no assertion criteria provided | research | PXE International | Mar 01, 2021 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at