rs7271776

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -17 ACMG points: 0P and 17B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1

The NM_015474.4(SAMHD1):c.237T>C(p.Pro79Pro) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000343 in 1,613,284 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0019 ( 1 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00018 ( 1 hom. )

Consequence

SAMHD1
NM_015474.4 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:7

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.142

Publications

2 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

SAMHD1 (HGNC:15925): (SAM and HD domain containing deoxynucleoside triphosphate triphosphohydrolase 1) This gene may play a role in regulation of the innate immune response. The encoded protein is upregulated in response to viral infection and may be involved in mediation of tumor necrosis factor-alpha proinflammatory responses. Mutations in this gene have been associated with Aicardi-Goutieres syndrome. [provided by RefSeq, Mar 2010]

SAMHD1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

Aicardi-Goutieres syndrome 5
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, PanelApp Australia, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Genomics England PanelApp, G2P
Moyamoya disease
Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
Aicardi-Goutieres syndrome
Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
familial chilblain lupus
Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
chilblain lupus 2
Inheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics
chilblain lupus
Inheritance: AD Classification: NO_KNOWN Submitted by: Illumina

SAMHD1 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -17 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.92).

BP6

Variant 20-36946776-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr20-36946776-A-G is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 448231.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.142 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00188 (287/152360) while in subpopulation AFR AF = 0.00642 (267/41590). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00579. There are 1 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 134 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein
SAMHD1	NM_015474.4 link	c.237T>C	p.Pro79Pro	synonymous_variant	Exon 2 of 16	ENST00000646673.2	NP_056289.2
SAMHD1	NM_001363729.2 link	c.237T>C	p.Pro79Pro	synonymous_variant	Exon 2 of 15		NP_001350658.1
SAMHD1	NM_001363733.2 link	c.237T>C	p.Pro79Pro	synonymous_variant	Exon 2 of 16		NP_001350662.1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
SAMHD1	ENST00000646673.2 link	c.237T>C	p.Pro79Pro	synonymous_variant	Exon 2 of 16		NM_015474.4	ENSP00000493536.2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00187

AC:

285

AN:

152242

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00639

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00105

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000147

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00143

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.000431

AC:

108

AN:

250488

AF XY:

0.000355

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00605

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000261

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00000884

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000182

AC:

266

AN:

1460924

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000165

AC XY:

120

AN XY:

726738

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00660

AC:

221

AN:

33470

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000336

AC:

AN:

44676

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26098

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

39678

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

86140

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

53376

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5766

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00000270

AC:

AN:

1111380

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000447

AC:

AN:

60340

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.447

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Exome Hom

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00188

AC:

287

AN:

152360

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00180

AC XY:

134

AN XY:

74506

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00642

AC:

267

AN:

41590

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00105

AC:

AN:

15292

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3472

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5194

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4828

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10624

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000147

AC:

AN:

68040

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00142

AC:

AN:

2116

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.499

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Genome Hom

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.000536

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00219

Asia WGS

AF:

0.000577

AC:

AN:

3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:7

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Benign:3

Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:not provided

- -

not specified

Benign:2

Sep 21, 2016

Athena Diagnostics

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Apr 12, 2018

Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Aicardi Goutieres syndrome

Benign:1

Feb 26, 2021

Natera, Inc.

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Aicardi-Goutieres syndrome 5

Benign:1

Jan 20, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.92

CADD

Benign

9.2

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.61

PhyloP100

0.14

Mutation Taster

=300/0

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over