rs727503367

Variant names:

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Uncertain significance. The variant received 5 ACMG points: 5P and 0B. PM1PM2PP3

The NM_033056.4(PCDH15):c.809T>G(p.Leu270Arg) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000031 in 1,613,930 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. L270P) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000020 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.000032 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

PCDH15
NM_033056.4 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Uncertain significance criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts U:3

Conservation

PhyloP100: 7.36

Publications

3 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

PCDH15 (HGNC:14674): (protocadherin related 15) This gene is a member of the cadherin superfamily. Family members encode integral membrane proteins that mediate calcium-dependent cell-cell adhesion. It plays an essential role in maintenance of normal retinal and cochlear function. Mutations in this gene result in hearing loss and Usher Syndrome Type IF (USH1F). Extensive alternative splicing resulting in multiple isoforms has been observed in the mouse ortholog. Similar alternatively spliced transcripts are inferred to occur in human, and additional variants are likely to occur. [provided by RefSeq, Dec 2008]

PCDH15 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 23
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, LIMITED Submitted by: Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), PanelApp Australia
Usher syndrome type 1
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: ClinGen, Orphanet
Usher syndrome type 1F
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), PanelApp Australia
hearing loss, autosomal recessive
Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
nonsyndromic genetic hearing loss
Inheritance: AR Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: ClinGen

PCDH15 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Uncertain_significance. The variant received 5 ACMG points.

PM1

In a hotspot region, there are 2 aminoacids with missense pathogenic changes in the window of +-8 aminoacids around while only 1 benign, 9 uncertain in NM_033056.4

PM2

Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;

PP3

MetaRNN computational evidence supports a deleterious effect, 0.783

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
PCDH15	NM_033056.4 link	c.809T>G	p.Leu270Arg	missense_variant	Exon 8 of 33	ENST00000320301.11	NP_149045.3	Q96QU1-1
PCDH15	NM_001384140.1 link	c.809T>G	p.Leu270Arg	missense_variant	Exon 8 of 38	ENST00000644397.2	NP_001371069.1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
PCDH15	ENST00000320301.11 link	c.809T>G	p.Leu270Arg	missense_variant	Exon 8 of 33	1	NM_033056.4	ENSP00000322604.6		Q96QU1-1
PCDH15	ENST00000644397.2 link	c.809T>G	p.Leu270Arg	missense_variant	Exon 8 of 38		NM_001384140.1	ENSP00000495195.1		A0A2R8Y6C0

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.0000197

AC:

AN:

152178

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000441

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.0000239

AC:

AN:

251348

AF XY:

0.0000442

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.0000993

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000440

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.0000322

AC:

AN:

1461752

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000399

AC XY:

AN XY:

727174

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

33470

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

44706

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26126

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

39696

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

86258

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

53418

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5766

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000414

AC:

AN:

1111924

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.0000166

AC:

AN:

60388

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.479

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.0000197

AC:

AN:

152178

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000269

AC XY:

AN XY:

74338

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

41456

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

15256

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3470

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5190

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4828

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10628

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

316

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000441

AC:

AN:

68028

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

2094

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.525

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.0000676

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00000378

ExAC

AF:

0.0000247

AC:

EpiCase

AF:

0.000218

EpiControl

AF:

0.000119

ClinVar

Significance: Uncertain significance

Submissions summary: Uncertain:3

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified

Uncertain:1

Jan 02, 2014

Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

The Leu270Arg variant in PCDH15 has not been previously reported in individuals with hearing loss or in large population studies. Computational analyses (bioc hemical amino acid properties, conservation, AlignGVGD, PolyPhen2, and SIFT) do not provide strong support for or against an impact to the protein. In summary, additional information is needed to determine the clinical significance of this variant. -

Usher syndrome type 1F

Uncertain:1

Nov 11, 2019

Natera, Inc.

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided

Uncertain:1

Aug 05, 2022

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This sequence change replaces leucine, which is neutral and non-polar, with arginine, which is basic and polar, at codon 270 of the PCDH15 protein (p.Leu270Arg). This variant is present in population databases (rs727503367, gnomAD 0.01%). This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with PCDH15-related conditions. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 164931). Algorithms developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function are either unavailable or do not agree on the potential impact of this missense change (SIFT: "Deleterious"; PolyPhen-2: "Probably Damaging"; Align-GVGD: "Class C0"). In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.23

BayesDel_addAF

Pathogenic

0.19

BayesDel_noAF

Pathogenic

0.18

CADD

Uncertain

(source)

DANN

Uncertain

1.0

DEOGEN2

Benign

0.078

T;.;.;.;.;T;.;.;T;.;T;.;.;T;.;T;.;.;.;.;.;.;T;.

Eigen

Uncertain

0.42

Eigen_PC

Uncertain

0.46

FATHMM_MKL

Pathogenic

0.98

LIST_S2

Uncertain

0.95

D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D

M_CAP

Uncertain

0.16

MetaRNN

Pathogenic

0.78

D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D

MetaSVM

Benign

-0.50

MutationAssessor

Benign

2.0

.;.;.;.;M;.;.;.;.;.;.;M;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;M;M

PhyloP100

7.4

PrimateAI

Uncertain

0.69

PROVEAN

Uncertain

-4.0

D;.;.;.;.;.;D;D;.;D;.;D;D;.;D;.;.;D;D;D;.;D;D;D

REVEL

Uncertain

0.55

Sift

Benign

0.056

T;.;.;.;.;.;T;T;.;T;.;D;T;.;T;.;.;D;D;D;.;D;D;T

Sift4G

Pathogenic

0.0

D;.;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D

Polyphen

0.99, 0.87, 0.51, 1.0, 0.98

.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;D;.;P;.;.;P;D;D;.;D;P;D

Vest4

0.76

MutPred

0.67

Gain of disorder (P = 0.0345);Gain of disorder (P = 0.0345);.;Gain of disorder (P = 0.0345);Gain of disorder (P = 0.0345);.;Gain of disorder (P = 0.0345);Gain of disorder (P = 0.0345);Gain of disorder (P = 0.0345);Gain of disorder (P = 0.0345);.;Gain of disorder (P = 0.0345);Gain of disorder (P = 0.0345);.;.;.;Gain of disorder (P = 0.0345);Gain of disorder (P = 0.0345);Gain of disorder (P = 0.0345);.;.;Gain of disorder (P = 0.0345);Gain of disorder (P = 0.0345);Gain of disorder (P = 0.0345);

MVP

0.84

MPC

0.11

ClinPred

0.75

GERP RS

4.8

Varity_R

0.81

gMVP

0.78

Mutation Taster

=27/73

disease causing

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over