rs727504762
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -2 ACMG points: 2P and 4B. PM2BP4_Strong
The NM_001399.5(EDA):c.742-14T>G variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant was absent in control chromosomes in GnomAD project. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001399.5 intron
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- tooth agenesis, selective, X-linked, 1Inheritance: XL Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P
- X-linked hypohidrotic ectodermal dysplasiaInheritance: XL Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: G2P, Orphanet, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
- tooth agenesisInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -2 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EDA | NM_001399.5 | c.742-14T>G | intron_variant | Intron 5 of 7 | ENST00000374552.9 | NP_001390.1 |
Ensembl
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EDA | ENST00000374552.9 | c.742-14T>G | intron_variant | Intron 5 of 7 | 1 | NM_001399.5 | ENSP00000363680.4 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 23
GnomAD4 exome Cov.: 28
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 23
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:1
The c.742-14T>G variant in EDA has not been previously reported in individuals with hypohidrotic ectodermal dysplasia and was absent from large population studies. This variant has been observed de novo in a young adult male with features of hypohidrotic ectodermal dysplasia (LMM internal data). This variant is located in the 3' splice region. Computational tools do not predict a splicing impact, though this information is not predictive enough to rule out pathogenicity. In summary, the clinical significance of this variant is uncertain. ACMG/AMP Criteria applied: PM2_Supporting, PM6.
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at