rs727504888
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. The variant received 0 ACMG points: 2P and 2B. PM2BP4_Moderate
The NM_178335.3(CCDC50):c.1221A>C(p.Arg407Ser) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000000685 in 1,460,486 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 12/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_178335.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing loss 44Inheritance: AD, Unknown Classification: STRONG, LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), PanelApp Australia
- autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing lossInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- nonsyndromic genetic hearing lossInheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: ClinGen
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Uncertain_significance. The variant received 0 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCDC50 | ENST00000392455.9 | c.1221A>C | p.Arg407Ser | missense_variant | Exon 9 of 12 | 1 | NM_178335.3 | ENSP00000376249.4 | ||
CCDC50 | ENST00000392456.4 | c.693A>C | p.Arg231Ser | missense_variant | Exon 8 of 11 | 1 | ENSP00000376250.4 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.00000401 AC: 1AN: 249668 AF XY: 0.00 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 6.85e-7 AC: 1AN: 1460486Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 726542 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Uncertain:1
The Arg407Ser variant in CCDC50 has not been reported in individuals with hearin g loss in other families or in large population studies. Computational predictio n tools and conservation analyses do not provide strong support for or against a n impact to the protein. In summary, additional information is needed to determi ne the clinical significance of this variant. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at