rs730881034
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points: 0P and 10B. BP4BP6BS1BS2
The NM_005633.4(SOS1):c.3269C>T(p.Pro1090Leu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000781 in 1,613,814 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 3 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.000079 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000078 ( 3 hom. )
Consequence
SOS1
NM_005633.4 missense
NM_005633.4 missense
Scores
3
11
5
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 9.15
Genes affected
SOS1 (HGNC:11187): (SOS Ras/Rac guanine nucleotide exchange factor 1) This gene encodes a protein that is a guanine nucleotide exchange factor for RAS proteins, membrane proteins that bind guanine nucleotides and participate in signal transduction pathways. GTP binding activates and GTP hydrolysis inactivates RAS proteins. The product of this gene may regulate RAS proteins by facilitating the exchange of GTP for GDP. Mutations in this gene are associated with gingival fibromatosis 1 and Noonan syndrome type 4. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.35309708).
BP6
Variant 2-38995200-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-38995200-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 40722.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=5, Uncertain_significance=3, Benign=1}.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population mid. gnomad4_exome allele frequency = 0.000078 (114/1461640) while in subpopulation MID AF= 0.00572 (33/5766). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00419. There are 3 homozygotes in gnomad4_exome. There are 63 alleles in male gnomad4_exome subpopulation. Median coverage is 31. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 12 AD gene.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SOS1 | NM_005633.4 | c.3269C>T | p.Pro1090Leu | missense_variant | 20/23 | ENST00000402219.8 | NP_005624.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SOS1 | ENST00000402219.8 | c.3269C>T | p.Pro1090Leu | missense_variant | 20/23 | 1 | NM_005633.4 | ENSP00000384675.2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000789 AC: 12AN: 152174Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
12
AN:
152174
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000147 AC: 37AN: 251006Hom.: 1 AF XY: 0.000147 AC XY: 20AN XY: 135640
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
37
AN:
251006
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
20
AN XY:
135640
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000780 AC: 114AN: 1461640Hom.: 3 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0000866 AC XY: 63AN XY: 727138
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
114
AN:
1461640
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
AC XY:
63
AN XY:
727138
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000789 AC: 12AN: 152174Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000538 AC XY: 4AN XY: 74340
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
12
AN:
152174
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
4
AN XY:
74340
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
ExAC
AF:
AC:
19
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:3Benign:6
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Uncertain:2Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Jul 05, 2023 | Variant summary: SOS1 c.3269C>T (p.Pro1090Leu) results in a non-conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Three of five in-silico tools predict a damaging effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00015 in 251006 control chromosomes, predominantly at a frequency of 0.00039 within the South Asian subpopulation in the gnomAD database. The observed variant frequency within South Asian control individuals in the gnomAD database is approximately 13 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in SOS1 causing Noonan Syndrome And Related Conditions phenotype (3e-05), strongly suggesting that the variant is a benign polymorphism found primarily in populations of South Asian origin. c c.3269C>T has been reported in the literature in a 4 m/o patient who presented with GERD, chylous pleural effusion, chronic lung disease and astigmatism (Bhoj_2016). The final diagnosis of the patient is reported as "undiagnosed" with a variant classification as "likely benign" and a "negative" diagnosis (Bhoj_2016). This report does not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Noonan Syndrome And Related Conditions. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. The following publication have been ascertained in the context of this evaluation (PMID: 27763634). Eight submitters have cited clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 and classified as benign/likely benign (n=5) and VUS (n=3). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as likely benign. - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | Nov 19, 2015 | Variant classified as Uncertain Significance - Favor Benign. The p.Pro1090Leu va riant in SOS1 has not been previously reported in individuals with a RASopathy, but has been identified in 11/66720 European chromosomes including one homozygou s individual and 6/16512 South Asian chromosomes by the Exome Aggregation Consor tium (ExAC, http://exac.broadinstitute.org; dbSNP rs730881034). Computational pr ediction tools and conservation analysis do not provide strong support for or ag ainst an impact to the protein. In summary, while the clinical significance of the p.Pro1090Leu variant is uncertain, its frequency suggests that it is more li kely to be benign. - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | May 22, 2015 | - - |
not provided Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Sep 01, 2018 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Sep 05, 2018 | Reported as likely benign in an individual with gastroesophageal reflux disease, chylous pleural effusion, chronic lung disease, and astigmatism. No segregation information was provided (Bhoj et al., 2017).; In silico analysis, which includes protein predictors and evolutionary conservation, supports a deleterious effect; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 27763634) - |
Noonan syndrome 4 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. - |
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Feb 19, 2020 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Fibromatosis, gingival, 1 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. - |
RASopathy Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Dec 11, 2023 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Pathogenic
DANN
Uncertain
DEOGEN2
Pathogenic
D;D;T
Eigen
Uncertain
Eigen_PC
Uncertain
FATHMM_MKL
Pathogenic
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
.;D;D
M_CAP
Uncertain
D
MetaRNN
Benign
T;T;T
MetaSVM
Uncertain
T
MutationAssessor
Uncertain
M;M;.
PrimateAI
Pathogenic
D
PROVEAN
Uncertain
D;D;D
REVEL
Uncertain
Sift
Uncertain
D;D;D
Sift4G
Uncertain
D;D;D
Polyphen
P;P;.
Vest4
MutPred
Loss of glycosylation at P1090 (P = 0.0054);Loss of glycosylation at P1090 (P = 0.0054);Loss of glycosylation at P1090 (P = 0.0054);
MVP
MPC
ClinPred
T
GERP RS
Varity_R
gMVP
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at