Menu
GeneBe

rs730881600

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -1 ACMG points: 2P and 3B. PM2BP4_ModerateBP6

The NM_000059.4(BRCA2):c.10250A>G(p.Tyr3417Cys) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000205 in 1,461,502 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/19 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. Y3417H) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: not found (cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0000021 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

BRCA2
NM_000059.4 missense

Scores

2
14

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:4B:3

Conservation

PhyloP100: -1.19
Variant links:
Genes affected
BRCA2 (HGNC:1101): (BRCA2 DNA repair associated) Inherited mutations in BRCA1 and this gene, BRCA2, confer increased lifetime risk of developing breast or ovarian cancer. Both BRCA1 and BRCA2 are involved in maintenance of genome stability, specifically the homologous recombination pathway for double-strand DNA repair. The largest exon in both genes is exon 11, which harbors the most important and frequent mutations in breast cancer patients. The BRCA2 gene was found on chromosome 13q12.3 in human. The BRCA2 protein contains several copies of a 70 aa motif called the BRC motif, and these motifs mediate binding to the RAD51 recombinase which functions in DNA repair. BRCA2 is considered a tumor suppressor gene, as tumors with BRCA2 mutations generally exhibit loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of the wild-type allele. [provided by RefSeq, May 2020]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -1 ACMG points.

PM2
Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.10357979).
BP6
Variant 13-32398763-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr13-32398763-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 182306.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Uncertain_significance=4, Likely_benign=3}.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
BRCA2NM_000059.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.10250A>G p.Tyr3417Cys missense_variant 27/27 ENST00000380152.8

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
BRCA2ENST00000380152.8 linkuse as main transcriptc.10250A>G p.Tyr3417Cys missense_variant 27/275 NM_000059.4 A2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
Cov.:
32
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00000205
AC:
3
AN:
1461502
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.00
AC XY:
0
AN XY:
727046
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00000270
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 genome
Cov.:
32

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:4Benign:3
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Uncertain:1Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxFeb 24, 2016This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpMay 14, 2022Variant summary: BRCA2 c.10250A>G (p.Tyr3417Cys) results in a non-conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Three of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant was absent in 250062 control chromosomes. The available data on variant occurrences in the general population are insufficient to allow any conclusion about variant significance. c.10250A>G has been reported in the literature as a VUS in at-least one individual affected with Hereditary Breast And Ovarian Cancer (example, Alemar_2017). These report(s) do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Hereditary Breast And Ovarian Cancer Syndrome. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. Four clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation. Multiple laboratories reported the variant with conflicting assessments (VUS, n=2; Likely Benign, n=2). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as uncertain significance. -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:1Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingColor Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color HealthDec 16, 2016- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsFeb 28, 2023The p.Y3417C variant (also known as c.10250A>G), located in coding exon 26 of the BRCA2 gene, results from an A to G substitution at nucleotide position 10250. The tyrosine at codon 3417 is replaced by cysteine, an amino acid with highly dissimilar properties. This alteration was identified in a Brazilian individual meeting NCCN criteria referred for BRCA1/2 testing (Alemar B et al. PLoS ONE, 2017 Nov;12:e0187630). This amino acid position is not well conserved in available vertebrate species. In addition, this alteration is predicted to be tolerated by in silico analysis. Since supporting evidence is limited at this time, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. -
not provided Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingQuest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan CapistranoSep 07, 2022It has not been reported in large, multi-ethnic general populations (http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org). In the published literature, the variant has been reported in individuals with a personal and/or family history of breast /ovarian cancer (PMIDs: 29161300 (2017) and 33471991 (2021)). Analysis of this variant using bioinformatics tools for the prediction of the effect of amino acid changes on protein structure and function yielded predictions that this variant is benign. Based on the available information, we are unable to determine the clinical significance of this variant. -
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeJan 31, 2024This sequence change replaces tyrosine, which is neutral and polar, with cysteine, which is neutral and slightly polar, at codon 3417 of the BRCA2 protein (p.Tyr3417Cys). This variant is not present in population databases (gnomAD no frequency). This missense change has been observed in individual(s) with personal or family history of breast or ovarian cancer (PMID: 29161300). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 182306). Advanced modeling of protein sequence and biophysical properties (such as structural, functional, and spatial information, amino acid conservation, physicochemical variation, residue mobility, and thermodynamic stability) performed at Invitae indicates that this missense variant is not expected to disrupt BRCA2 protein function with a negative predictive value of 95%. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -
Hereditary cancer Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMendelicsJan 23, 2024- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.070
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.34
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.73
Cadd
Benign
9.3
Dann
Benign
0.92
Eigen
Benign
-1.6
Eigen_PC
Benign
-1.7
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.017
N
M_CAP
Benign
0.063
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.10
T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.88
T
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
N;N
PrimateAI
Benign
0.35
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-0.48
N;N
REVEL
Benign
0.075
Sift
Pathogenic
0.0
D;D
Sift4G
Pathogenic
0.0
D;D
Vest4
0.22
MutPred
0.10
Loss of MoRF binding (P = 0.0808);Loss of MoRF binding (P = 0.0808);
MVP
0.76
MPC
0.086
ClinPred
0.081
T
GERP RS
-9.6
gMVP
0.042

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs730881600; hg19: chr13-32972900; API