Menu
GeneBe

rs730881963

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_000455.5(STK11):c.795G>A(p.Glu265=) variant causes a synonymous change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000769 in 1,611,936 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000066 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000078 ( 2 hom. )

Consequence

STK11
NM_000455.5 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:17

Conservation

PhyloP100: 3.58
Variant links:
Genes affected
STK11 (HGNC:11389): (serine/threonine kinase 11) The protein encoded by this gene is a serine/threonine kinase that regulates cell polarity and energy metabolism and functions as a tumor suppressor. Mutations in this gene have been associated with the autosomal dominant Peutz-Jeghers syndrome, as well as with skin, pancreatic, and testicular cancers. [provided by RefSeq, May 2022]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.49).
BP6
Variant 19-1221273-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr19-1221273-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 182885.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr19-1221273-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population sas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.0000657 (10/152220) while in subpopulation SAS AF= 0.000828 (4/4832). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.000282. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 7 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd at 10 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
STK11NM_000455.5 linkuse as main transcriptc.795G>A p.Glu265= synonymous_variant 6/10 ENST00000326873.12
STK11NM_001407255.1 linkuse as main transcriptc.795G>A p.Glu265= synonymous_variant 6/9
STK11NR_176325.1 linkuse as main transcriptn.2062G>A non_coding_transcript_exon_variant 7/11

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
STK11ENST00000326873.12 linkuse as main transcriptc.795G>A p.Glu265= synonymous_variant 6/101 NM_000455.5 P1Q15831-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0000657
AC:
10
AN:
152220
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0000241
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000196
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000828
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000294
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000203
AC:
50
AN:
246466
Hom.:
1
AF XY:
0.000164
AC XY:
22
AN XY:
134254
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000583
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.000758
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000449
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000334
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0000781
AC:
114
AN:
1459716
Hom.:
2
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.0000964
AC XY:
70
AN XY:
726052
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000515
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.000651
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0000171
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000133
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0000657
AC:
10
AN:
152220
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.0000941
AC XY:
7
AN XY:
74362
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0000241
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.000196
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.000828
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0000294
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Alfa
AF:
0.0000847
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.0000756
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000289
AC:
1
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.00
EpiControl
AF:
0.000178

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:17
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Peutz-Jeghers syndrome Benign:7
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome-Nilou LabJul 15, 2021- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCounsylJun 01, 2016- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMyriad Genetics, Inc.Apr 13, 2023This variant is considered benign. This variant is a silent/synonymous amino acid change and it is not expected to impact splicing. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAll of Us Research Program, National Institutes of HealthJan 11, 2024- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingKCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control CenterJul 07, 2023- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMendelicsMay 28, 2019- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeJan 31, 2024- -
not provided Benign:3
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact SciencesOct 24, 2017- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingQuest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan CapistranoApr 18, 2023- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCeGaT Center for Human Genetics TuebingenNov 01, 2022STK11: BP4, BP7 -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submittercurationSema4, Sema4Jul 29, 2021- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingColor Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color HealthMar 06, 2016- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsJul 17, 2014This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
not specified Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxJul 11, 2014This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpJan 01, 2022- -
Breast and/or ovarian cancer Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern OntarioSep 26, 2022- -
Familial ovarian cancer Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System-The STK11 p.Glu265= variant was not identified in the literature nor was it identified in the Cosmic, MutDB, LOVD 3.0, Zhejiang Colon Cancer Database, and Insight Hereditary Tumors Database. The variant was identified in dbSNP (ID: rs730881963) “With Likely benign allele”, ClinVar (classified as benign by GeneDx and likely benign by Ambry Genetics, Invitae and Counsyl), Clinvitae (3x), and in control databases in 50 (1 homozygous) of 275192 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.0002 increasing the likelihood this could be a low frequency benign variant (Genome Aggregation Consortium Feb 27, 2017). Breakdown of the observations by population include, other in 4 of 6416 chromosomes (freq. 0.0006), Latino in 18 (1 homozygous) of 34300 chromosomes (freq. 0.0005), European Non-Finnish in 5 of 125550 chromosomes (freq. 0.00004), and South Asian in 23 of 30524 chromosomes (freq. 0.0007); it was not seen in the African, Ashkenazi Jewish, European Finnish, and East Asian populations. The variant was identified by our laboratory in 1 individual with breast cancer, co-occurring with a pathogenic BRCA2 variant (c.6359C>G/ p.Ser2120X), increasing the likelihood that the p.Glu265=variant does not have clinical significance.The p.Glu265= variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it does not result in a change of amino acid and is not located in a known consensus splice site. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and 1 of 5 in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) predict a greater than 10% difference in splicing; this is not very predictive of pathogenicity. In summary, based on the above information this variant meets our laboratory's criteria to be classified as benign. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.49
Cadd
Benign
11
Dann
Benign
0.94

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs730881963; hg19: chr19-1221272; API