rs73181648
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The NM_032119.4(ADGRV1):c.3956G>A(p.Arg1319Gln) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000608 in 1,613,868 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 8 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R1319W) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_032119.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ADGRV1 | NM_032119.4 | c.3956G>A | p.Arg1319Gln | missense_variant | 20/90 | ENST00000405460.9 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ADGRV1 | ENST00000405460.9 | c.3956G>A | p.Arg1319Gln | missense_variant | 20/90 | 1 | NM_032119.4 | P1 | |
ADGRV1 | ENST00000640403.1 | c.1247G>A | p.Arg416Gln | missense_variant | 10/29 | 5 | |||
ADGRV1 | ENST00000504142.2 | n.2722G>A | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 14/14 | 5 | ||||
ADGRV1 | ENST00000639676.1 | n.1554G>A | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 8/11 | 5 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes ? AF: 0.00350 AC: 533AN: 152116Hom.: 4 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000840 AC: 209AN: 248940Hom.: 2 AF XY: 0.000607 AC XY: 82AN XY: 135040
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000309 AC: 451AN: 1461634Hom.: 4 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000260 AC XY: 189AN XY: 727090
GnomAD4 genome ? AF: 0.00349 AC: 531AN: 152234Hom.: 4 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00343 AC XY: 255AN XY: 74428
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Invitae | Jan 31, 2024 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Athena Diagnostics | Jan 06, 2020 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Jul 15, 2022 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Mar 17, 2020 | This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 30180840) - |
not specified Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | Apr 03, 2015 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | Apr 30, 2012 | Arg1319Gln in Exon 20 of GPR98: This variant is not expected to have clinical si gnificance because it has been identified in 1.1% (36/3232) of African American chromosomes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (http: //evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS; dbSNP rs73181648). - |
Usher syndrome type 2C Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at