Menu
GeneBe

rs73418153

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_024809.5(TCTN2):c.873A>G(p.Ala291=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0253 in 1,610,976 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1,189 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.055 ( 450 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.022 ( 739 hom. )

Consequence

TCTN2
NM_024809.5 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:6

Conservation

PhyloP100: -3.58
Variant links:
Genes affected
TCTN2 (HGNC:25774): (tectonic family member 2) This gene encodes a type I membrane protein that belongs to the tectonic family. Studies in mice suggest that this protein may be involved in hedgehog signaling, and essential for ciliogenesis. Mutations in this gene are associated with Meckel syndrome type 8. Alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2011]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.79).
BP6
Variant 12-123688159-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr12-123688159-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 126292.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr12-123688159-A-G is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-3.58 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.132 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
TCTN2NM_024809.5 linkuse as main transcriptc.873A>G p.Ala291= synonymous_variant 7/18 ENST00000303372.7

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
TCTN2ENST00000303372.7 linkuse as main transcriptc.873A>G p.Ala291= synonymous_variant 7/181 NM_024809.5 P4Q96GX1-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0547
AC:
8313
AN:
151964
Hom.:
452
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.135
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0747
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.0225
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00693
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.0342
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00663
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.0287
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0171
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0402
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0297
AC:
7469
AN:
251070
Hom.:
250
AF XY:
0.0280
AC XY:
3800
AN XY:
135678
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.132
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0492
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0221
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00696
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.0385
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00809
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0158
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.0228
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0222
AC:
32434
AN:
1458902
Hom.:
739
Cov.:
35
AF XY:
0.0224
AC XY:
16262
AN XY:
725838
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.132
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.0532
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.0226
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00439
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0414
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00862
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0172
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0276
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0548
AC:
8330
AN:
152074
Hom.:
450
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0541
AC XY:
4025
AN XY:
74338
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.135
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.0746
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.0225
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00695
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.0345
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00663
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0171
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.0398
Alfa
AF:
0.0312
Hom.:
105
Bravo
AF:
0.0616
Asia WGS
AF:
0.0320
AC:
112
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.0189
EpiControl
AF:
0.0175

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:6
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxMar 04, 2016This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingGenetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago-Likely benign based on allele frequency in 1000 Genomes Project or ESP global frequency and its presence in a patient with a rare or unrelated disease phenotype. NOT Sanger confirmed. -
Meckel-Gruber syndrome;C0431399:Familial aplasia of the vermis Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeJan 31, 2024- -
Joubert syndrome 24 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Meckel syndrome, type 8 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.79
Cadd
Benign
0.020
Dann
Benign
0.55

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs73418153; hg19: chr12-124172706; API