rs73703715

Variant names:

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_012301.4(MAGI2):c.2379C>T(p.Leu793Leu) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00164 in 1,612,850 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 43 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0090 ( 29 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00088 ( 14 hom. )

Consequence

MAGI2
NM_012301.4 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:6

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.128

Publications

2 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

MAGI2 (HGNC:18957): (membrane associated guanylate kinase, WW and PDZ domain containing 2) The protein encoded by this gene interacts with atrophin-1. Atrophin-1 contains a polyglutamine repeat, expansion of which is responsible for dentatorubral and pallidoluysian atrophy. This encoded protein is characterized by two WW domains, a guanylate kinase-like domain, and multiple PDZ domains. It has structural similarity to the membrane-associated guanylate kinase homologue (MAGUK) family. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

MAGI2 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

nephrotic syndrome 15
Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG, LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
familial idiopathic steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome
Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
genetic developmental and epileptic encephalopathy
Inheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: G2P
epilepsy
Inheritance: AD Classification: NO_KNOWN Submitted by: ClinGen

MAGI2 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.62).

BP6

Variant 7-78178035-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr7-78178035-G-A is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 129561.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.128 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00899 (1368/152190) while in subpopulation AFR AF = 0.0317 (1314/41508). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0302. There are 29 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 696 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 29 AD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
MAGI2	NM_012301.4 link	c.2379C>T	p.Leu793Leu	synonymous_variant	Exon 14 of 22	ENST00000354212.9	NP_036433.2	Q86UL8-1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
MAGI2	ENST00000354212.9 link	c.2379C>T	p.Leu793Leu	synonymous_variant	Exon 14 of 22	1	NM_012301.4	ENSP00000346151.4		Q86UL8-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00890

AC:

1354

AN:

152072

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0314

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00262

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.000192

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000441

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00478

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.00243

AC:

610

AN:

251126

AF XY:

0.00183

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.0324

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00191

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.0000544

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000617

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00147

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000880

AC:

1285

AN:

1460660

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000749

AC XY:

544

AN XY:

726684

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0306

AC:

1022

AN:

33416

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00179

AC:

AN:

44696

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26102

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.0000504

AC:

AN:

39670

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.000128

AC:

AN:

86230

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

53384

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00191

AC:

AN:

5762

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000405

AC:

AN:

1111066

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00189

AC:

114

AN:

60334

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.464

Heterozygous variant carriers

111

166

222

277

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Exome Hom

Variant carriers

128

160

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00899

AC:

1368

AN:

152190

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00935

AC XY:

696

AN XY:

74416

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0317

AC:

1314

AN:

41508

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00262

AC:

AN:

15286

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3470

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.000193

AC:

AN:

5186

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4824

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10596

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000441

AC:

AN:

68004

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00473

AC:

AN:

2112

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.500

Heterozygous variant carriers

135

202

270

337

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Genome Hom

Variant carriers

100

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.00607

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00999

Asia WGS

AF:

0.00347

AC:

AN:

3476

EpiCase

AF:

0.0000546

EpiControl

AF:

0.0000593

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:6

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Benign:4

Nov 20, 2017

Athena Diagnostics

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 23, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:not provided

- -

Mar 18, 2021

GeneDx

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

MAGI2-related disorder

Benign:1

Jul 18, 2019

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance:Benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is classified as benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

not specified

Benign:1

Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

Likely benign based on allele frequency in 1000 Genomes Project or ESP global frequency and its presence in a patient with a rare or unrelated disease phenotype. NOT Sanger confirmed. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.62

CADD

Benign

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.71

PhyloP100

-0.13

PromoterAI

-0.035

Neutral

(source)

Mutation Taster

=95/5

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over