rs73765819
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2
The NM_001010892.3(RSPH4A):āc.1731A>Gā(p.Lys577Lys) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00117 in 1,613,266 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 22 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (ā ā ).
Frequency
Genomes: š 0.0062 ( 11 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes š: 0.00064 ( 11 hom. )
Consequence
RSPH4A
NM_001010892.3 synonymous
NM_001010892.3 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 0.850
Genes affected
RSPH4A (HGNC:21558): (radial spoke head component 4A) This gene encodes a protein that appears to be a component the radial spoke head, as determined by homology to similar proteins in the biflagellate alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii and other ciliates. Radial spokes, which are regularly spaced along cilia, sperm, and flagella axonemes, consist of a thin 'stalk' and a bulbous 'head' that form a signal transduction scaffold between the central pair of microtubules and dynein. Mutations in this gene cause primary ciliary dyskinesia 1, a disease arising from dysmotility of motile cilia and sperm. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Sep 2009]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.66).
BP6
Variant 6-116629635-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr6-116629635-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 197171.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.85 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00623 (949/152334) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.0223 (926/41566). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0211. There are 11 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 439 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 11 AR gene
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSPH4A | NM_001010892.3 | c.1731A>G | p.Lys577Lys | synonymous_variant | 4/6 | ENST00000229554.10 | NP_001010892.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSPH4A | ENST00000229554.10 | c.1731A>G | p.Lys577Lys | synonymous_variant | 4/6 | 1 | NM_001010892.3 | ENSP00000229554.5 | ||
RSPH4A | ENST00000368581.8 | c.1663-800A>G | intron_variant | 1 | ENSP00000357570.4 | |||||
RSPH4A | ENST00000368580.4 | c.990A>G | p.Lys330Lys | synonymous_variant | 3/5 | 5 | ENSP00000357569.4 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00622 AC: 947AN: 152216Hom.: 11 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
947
AN:
152216
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00160 AC: 398AN: 248860Hom.: 2 AF XY: 0.00108 AC XY: 145AN XY: 134720
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
398
AN:
248860
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
145
AN XY:
134720
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000638 AC: 932AN: 1460932Hom.: 11 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.000572 AC XY: 416AN XY: 726860
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
932
AN:
1460932
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
AC XY:
416
AN XY:
726860
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00623 AC: 949AN: 152334Hom.: 11 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00589 AC XY: 439AN XY: 74486
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
949
AN:
152334
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
439
AN XY:
74486
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
7
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:4
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
Primary ciliary dyskinesia Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 18, 2024 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Sep 09, 2014 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
not specified Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Mar 05, 2015 | - - |
Primary ciliary dyskinesia 11 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at