rs73765819

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_001010892.3(RSPH4A):ā€‹c.1731A>Gā€‹(p.Lys577Lys) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00117 in 1,613,266 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 22 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (ā˜…ā˜…).

Frequency

Genomes: š‘“ 0.0062 ( 11 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes š‘“: 0.00064 ( 11 hom. )

Consequence

RSPH4A
NM_001010892.3 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:4

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.850
Variant links:
Genes affected
RSPH4A (HGNC:21558): (radial spoke head component 4A) This gene encodes a protein that appears to be a component the radial spoke head, as determined by homology to similar proteins in the biflagellate alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii and other ciliates. Radial spokes, which are regularly spaced along cilia, sperm, and flagella axonemes, consist of a thin 'stalk' and a bulbous 'head' that form a signal transduction scaffold between the central pair of microtubules and dynein. Mutations in this gene cause primary ciliary dyskinesia 1, a disease arising from dysmotility of motile cilia and sperm. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Sep 2009]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.66).
BP6
Variant 6-116629635-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr6-116629635-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 197171.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.85 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00623 (949/152334) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.0223 (926/41566). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0211. There are 11 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 439 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 11 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
RSPH4ANM_001010892.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.1731A>G p.Lys577Lys synonymous_variant 4/6 ENST00000229554.10 NP_001010892.1 Q5TD94-1B3KTA9

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
RSPH4AENST00000229554.10 linkuse as main transcriptc.1731A>G p.Lys577Lys synonymous_variant 4/61 NM_001010892.3 ENSP00000229554.5 Q5TD94-1
RSPH4AENST00000368581.8 linkuse as main transcriptc.1663-800A>G intron_variant 1 ENSP00000357570.4 Q5TD94-3
RSPH4AENST00000368580.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.990A>G p.Lys330Lys synonymous_variant 3/55 ENSP00000357569.4 Q5TD94-2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00622
AC:
947
AN:
152216
Hom.:
11
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0223
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00111
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000147
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00239
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00160
AC:
398
AN:
248860
Hom.:
2
AF XY:
0.00108
AC XY:
145
AN XY:
134720
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0220
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000954
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.000131
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000270
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000164
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000638
AC:
932
AN:
1460932
Hom.:
11
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.000572
AC XY:
416
AN XY:
726860
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0227
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00107
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000812
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0000126
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00164
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00623
AC:
949
AN:
152334
Hom.:
11
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00589
AC XY:
439
AN XY:
74486
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0223
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00111
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0000147
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00237
Alfa
AF:
0.00275
Hom.:
8
Bravo
AF:
0.00747
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00202
AC:
7
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.00
EpiControl
AF:
0.0000593

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:4
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Primary ciliary dyskinesia Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpJan 18, 2024- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsSep 09, 2014This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
not specified Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)Mar 05, 2015- -
Primary ciliary dyskinesia 11 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.66
CADD
Benign
2.5
DANN
Benign
0.55

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs73765819; hg19: chr6-116950798; API