rs73959261

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -19 ACMG points: 0P and 19B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_012233.3(RAB3GAP1):c.357A>G(p.Val119Val) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00184 in 1,608,324 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 54 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0096 ( 24 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.0010 ( 30 hom. )

Consequence

RAB3GAP1
NM_012233.3 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:6

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.301

Publications

4 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

RAB3GAP1 (HGNC:17063): (RAB3 GTPase activating protein catalytic subunit 1) This gene encodes the catalytic subunit of a Rab GTPase activating protein. The encoded protein forms a heterodimer with a non-catalytic subunit to specifically regulate the activity of members of the Rab3 subfamily of small G proteins. This protein mediates the hydrolysis of GTP bound Rab3 to the GDP bound form. Mutations in this gene are associated with Warburg micro syndrome. Alternate splicing results in multiple transcript variants.[provided by RefSeq, Feb 2010]

RAB3GAP1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

Warburg micro syndrome
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: ClinGen, Orphanet
Warburg micro syndrome 1
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P
cataract-intellectual disability-hypogonadism syndrome
Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

RAB3GAP1 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -19 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.45).

BP6

Variant 2-135093688-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-135093688-A-G is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 130070.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.301 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00961 (1463/152298) while in subpopulation AFR AF = 0.0336 (1398/41562). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0322. There are 24 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 673 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 24 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
RAB3GAP1	NM_012233.3 link	c.357A>G	p.Val119Val	synonymous_variant	Exon 5 of 24	ENST00000264158.13	NP_036365.1	Q15042-1B9A6J2

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
RAB3GAP1	ENST00000264158.13 link	c.357A>G	p.Val119Val	synonymous_variant	Exon 5 of 24	1	NM_012233.3	ENSP00000264158.8		Q15042-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00956

AC:

1455

AN:

152180

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0335

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00314

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.000620

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000147

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00716

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.00235

AC:

591

AN:

251466

AF XY:

0.00175

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.0325

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00130

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000440

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00147

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.00103

AC:

1497

AN:

1456026

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000876

AC XY:

635

AN XY:

724740

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0375

AC:

1248

AN:

33308

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00166

AC:

AN:

44702

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26092

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

39650

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.000151

AC:

AN:

86128

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

53408

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00122

AC:

AN:

5760

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000154

AC:

AN:

1106760

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00229

AC:

138

AN:

60218

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.460

Heterozygous variant carriers

139

209

278

348

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Exome Hom

Variant carriers

132

176

220

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00961

AC:

1463

AN:

152298

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00904

AC XY:

673

AN XY:

74472

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0336

AC:

1398

AN:

41562

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00307

AC:

AN:

15286

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3472

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5178

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.000414

AC:

AN:

4832

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10620

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000147

AC:

AN:

68026

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00709

AC:

AN:

2116

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.498

Heterozygous variant carriers

137

206

274

343

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Genome Hom

Variant carriers

100

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.00408

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.0110

Asia WGS

AF:

0.00231

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.00

EpiControl

AF:

0.000119

ClinVar

Significance: Benign

Submissions summary: Benign:6

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified

Benign:3

Apr 23, 2021

Athena Diagnostics

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

Likely benign based on allele frequency in 1000 Genomes Project or ESP global frequency and its presence in a patient with a rare or unrelated disease phenotype. NOT Sanger confirmed. -

May 23, 2016

GeneDx

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

not provided

Benign:2

Feb 03, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:not provided

- -

Warburg micro syndrome 1

Benign:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.45

CADD

Benign

8.4

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.79

PhyloP100

0.30

RBP_binding_hub_radar

0.0

RBP_regulation_power_radar

2.7

Mutation Taster

=99/1

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over