rs73973137

Variant names:

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2

The NM_001267550.2(TTN):c.32750C>T(p.Pro10917Leu) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000542 in 1,609,910 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 6 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 12/19 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. P10917Q) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0028 ( 1 hom., cov: 31)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00031 ( 5 hom. )

Consequence

TTN
NM_001267550.2 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:15

Conservation

PhyloP100: 3.93

Publications

3 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

TTN (HGNC:12403): (titin) This gene encodes a large abundant protein of striated muscle. The product of this gene is divided into two regions, a N-terminal I-band and a C-terminal A-band. The I-band, which is the elastic part of the molecule, contains two regions of tandem immunoglobulin domains on either side of a PEVK region that is rich in proline, glutamate, valine and lysine. The A-band, which is thought to act as a protein-ruler, contains a mixture of immunoglobulin and fibronectin repeats, and possesses kinase activity. An N-terminal Z-disc region and a C-terminal M-line region bind to the Z-line and M-line of the sarcomere, respectively, so that a single titin molecule spans half the length of a sarcomere. Titin also contains binding sites for muscle associated proteins so it serves as an adhesion template for the assembly of contractile machinery in muscle cells. It has also been identified as a structural protein for chromosomes. Alternative splicing of this gene results in multiple transcript variants. Considerable variability exists in the I-band, the M-line and the Z-disc regions of titin. Variability in the I-band region contributes to the differences in elasticity of different titin isoforms and, therefore, to the differences in elasticity of different muscle types. Mutations in this gene are associated with familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy 9, and autoantibodies to titin are produced in patients with the autoimmune disease scleroderma. [provided by RefSeq, Feb 2012]

TTN links:

TTN-AS1 (HGNC:44124): (TTN antisense RNA 1) This gene encodes a non-coding RNA transcribed from the opposite strand to the titin gene. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2016]

TTN-AS1 links:

LOC124906100 (HGNC:):

LOC124906100 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.010159224).

BP6

Variant 2-178684055-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-178684055-G-A is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 46878.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00282 (424/150326) while in subpopulation AFR AF = 0.01 (411/40902). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00925. There are 1 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 194 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 31. This position passed quality control check.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 5 AD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
TTN	NM_001267550.2 link	c.32750C>T	p.Pro10917Leu	missense_variant	Exon 133 of 363	ENST00000589042.5	NP_001254479.2

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
TTN	ENST00000589042.5 link	c.32750C>T	p.Pro10917Leu	missense_variant	Exon 133 of 363	5	NM_001267550.2	ENSP00000467141.1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00282

AC:

423

AN:

150222

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0101

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000530

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000444

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.000974

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.000708

AC:

176

AN:

248426

AF XY:

0.000512

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.0104

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000349

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000178

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000332

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000307

AC:

448

AN:

1459584

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000258

AC XY:

187

AN XY:

726042

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0115

AC:

385

AN:

33408

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000538

AC:

AN:

44622

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26072

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

39588

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

85882

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

53262

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5760

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00000810

AC:

AN:

1110700

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000498

AC:

AN:

60290

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.457

Heterozygous variant carriers

100

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Exome Hom

Variant carriers

100

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00282

AC:

424

AN:

150326

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00265

AC XY:

194

AN XY:

73288

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0100

AC:

411

AN:

40902

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000529

AC:

AN:

15118

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3460

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5110

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4758

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10120

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

292

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000444

AC:

AN:

67584

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000964

AC:

AN:

2074

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.503

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.000970

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00331

ESP6500AA

AF:

0.00942

AC:

ESP6500EA

AF:

0.00

AC:

ExAC

AF:

0.000786

AC:

Asia WGS

AF:

0.000577

AC:

AN:

3478

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:15

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified

Benign:5

Nov 09, 2020

Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

Variant summary: TTN c.29018C>T (p.Pro9673Leu) results in a non-conservative amino acid change located in the I-band region (cardiodb.org) of the encoded protein sequence. Three of four in-silico tools predict a damaging effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00071 in 248426 control chromosomes, predominantly at a frequency of 0.01 within the African or African-American subpopulation in the gnomAD database. The observed variant frequency within African or African-American control individuals in the gnomAD database is approximately 25.6- fold the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in TTN causing Dilated Cardiomyopathy phenotype (0.00039), strongly suggesting that the variant is a benign polymorphism found primarily in populations of African or African-American origin. To our knowledge, no occurrence of c.29018C>T in individuals affected with Dilated Cardiomyopathy and no experimental evidence demonstrating its impact on protein function have been reported. Five clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation, citing the variant as benign/likely benign (n=4) or uncertain significance (n=1). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as benign. -

Apr 09, 2025

Molecular Diagnostic Laboratory for Inherited Cardiovascular Disease, Montreal Heart Institute

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

BS1;BP6;BP7 -

Mar 19, 2012

Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

p.Pro9673Leu in Exon 130 of TTN: This variant is not expected to have clinical s ignificance because it has been identified in 1.1% (31/2912) of African American chromosomes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (http ://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS; dbSNP rs73973137). -

Sep 22, 2014

Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jun 04, 2014

GeneDx

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

not provided

Benign:2

Jul 29, 2024

ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Apr 01, 2024

CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

TTN: BP4, BS1 -

Autosomal recessive limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 2J

Uncertain:1

Jan 12, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

TTN-related disorder

Benign:1

Jan 11, 2021

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance:Benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is classified as benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Autosomal recessive limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 2J;C1858763:Dilated cardiomyopathy 1G

Benign:1

Feb 02, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Dilated cardiomyopathy 1G

Benign:1

Jan 12, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Cardiomyopathy

Benign:1

Aug 08, 2017

CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Early-onset myopathy with fatal cardiomyopathy

Benign:1

Jan 12, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Tibial muscular dystrophy

Benign:1

Jan 12, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Myopathy, myofibrillar, 9, with early respiratory failure

Benign:1

Jan 12, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Cardiovascular phenotype

Benign:1

Jul 19, 2013

Ambry Genetics

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.17

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.33

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.23

CADD

Benign

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.94

Eigen

Benign

0.039

Eigen_PC

Benign

0.21

FATHMM_MKL

Uncertain

0.81

LIST_S2

Benign

0.82

T;T;.;T

M_CAP

Benign

0.068

MetaRNN

Benign

0.010

T;T;T;T

MetaSVM

Benign

-0.56

PhyloP100

3.9

PrimateAI

Benign

0.44

PROVEAN

Pathogenic

-4.5

D;.;.;.

REVEL

Uncertain

0.33

Sift

Uncertain

0.010

D;.;.;.

Polyphen

0.010

.;.;B;B

Vest4

0.38

MVP

0.62

MPC

0.088

ClinPred

0.031

GERP RS

5.6

Mutation Taster

=60/40

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over