rs74144963
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_022124.6(CDH23):c.67+12C>T variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00905 in 1,564,202 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1,112 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_022124.6 intron
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 12Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P, PanelApp Australia
- nonsyndromic genetic hearing lossInheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
- Usher syndrome type 1Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: ClinGen, Orphanet
- Usher syndrome type 1DInheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), PanelApp Australia
- hearing loss, autosomal recessiveInheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0479 AC: 7290AN: 152114Hom.: 583 Cov.: 33 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0115 AC: 2005AN: 174620 AF XY: 0.00904 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00485 AC: 6855AN: 1411970Hom.: 527 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.00417 AC XY: 2912AN XY: 697906 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0480 AC: 7307AN: 152232Hom.: 585 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0464 AC XY: 3453AN XY: 74438 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:2
67+12C>T in intron 2 of CDH23: This variant is not expected to have clinical sig nificance because it has been identified in 14% (484/3458) of African American c hromosomes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (http:/ /evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS/; dbSNP rs74144963) -
This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
not provided Benign:2
- -
- -
Usher syndrome type 1D Benign:1
This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 12 Benign:1
This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at