rs74349463
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points: 8P and 16B. PVS1BP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_001258399.2(CCDC103):c.280+2T>C variant causes a splice donor, intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.152 in 1,613,454 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 19,755 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 3/3 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001258399.2 splice_donor, intron
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCDC103 | NM_213607.3 | c.276+6T>C | splice_region_variant, intron_variant | ENST00000417826.3 | NP_998772.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCDC103 | ENST00000417826.3 | c.276+6T>C | splice_region_variant, intron_variant | 1 | NM_213607.3 | ENSP00000391692.2 | ||||
CCDC103 | ENST00000410006.6 | c.276+6T>C | splice_region_variant, intron_variant | 2 | ENSP00000387252.1 | |||||
CCDC103 | ENST00000357776.6 | c.276+6T>C | splice_region_variant, intron_variant | 2 | ENSP00000350420.2 | |||||
CCDC103 | ENST00000410027.5 | c.276+6T>C | splice_region_variant, intron_variant | 4 | ENSP00000386640.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.126 AC: 19130AN: 152086Hom.: 1378 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.134 AC: 33561AN: 250970Hom.: 2708 AF XY: 0.140 AC XY: 18960AN XY: 135622
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.155 AC: 226189AN: 1461250Hom.: 18379 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.156 AC XY: 113169AN XY: 726926
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.126 AC: 19125AN: 152204Hom.: 1376 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.123 AC XY: 9187AN XY: 74398
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | Mar 29, 2016 | Variant identified in a genome or exome case(s) and assessed due to predicted null impact of the variant or pathogenic assertions in the literature or databases. Disclaimer: This variant has not undergone full assessment. The following are preliminary notes: Frequency - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Primary ciliary dyskinesia Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 31, 2024 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jun 14, 2016 | - - |
not provided Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Jul 05, 2018 | - - |
Primary ciliary dyskinesia 17 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at