rs74486266

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -14 ACMG points: 0P and 14B. BP4_StrongBP6BP7BS1BS2

The NM_001202.6(BMP4):​c.76T>C​(p.Leu26Leu) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0027 in 1,614,140 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 7 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0020 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0028 ( 7 hom. )

Consequence

BMP4
NM_001202.6 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:8

Conservation

PhyloP100: 3.49

Publications

4 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
BMP4 (HGNC:1071): (bone morphogenetic protein 4) This gene encodes a secreted ligand of the TGF-beta (transforming growth factor-beta) superfamily of proteins. Ligands of this family bind various TGF-beta receptors leading to recruitment and activation of SMAD family transcription factors that regulate gene expression. The encoded preproprotein is proteolytically processed to generate each subunit of the disulfide-linked homodimer. This protein regulates heart development and adipogenesis. Mutations in this gene are associated with orofacial cleft and microphthalmia in human patients. The encoded protein may also be involved in the pathology of multiple cardiovascular diseases and human cancers. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2016]
BMP4 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • microphthalmia with brain and digit anomalies
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: PanelApp Australia, Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics
  • Stickler syndrome
    Inheritance: AR Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
  • renal agenesis, unilateral
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • orofacial cleft 11
    Inheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -14 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.58).
BP6
Variant 14-53952147-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr14-53952147-A-G is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 468357.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=3.49 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00198 (302/152316) while in subpopulation NFE AF = 0.00347 (236/68018). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00311. There are 0 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 138 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 7 AD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
BMP4NM_001202.6 linkc.76T>C p.Leu26Leu synonymous_variant Exon 3 of 4 ENST00000245451.9 NP_001193.2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
BMP4ENST00000245451.9 linkc.76T>C p.Leu26Leu synonymous_variant Exon 3 of 4 1 NM_001202.6 ENSP00000245451.4

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00198
AC:
302
AN:
152198
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000603
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00229
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.000288
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.000377
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00347
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000478
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00162
AC:
406
AN:
251328
AF XY:
0.00167
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000493
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000578
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.000277
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00322
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000978
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00277
AC:
4051
AN:
1461824
Hom.:
7
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00267
AC XY:
1945
AN XY:
727208
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000538
AC:
18
AN:
33474
American (AMR)
AF:
0.000716
AC:
32
AN:
44722
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
26128
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
39700
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0000232
AC:
2
AN:
86250
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.000300
AC:
16
AN:
53418
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5768
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00348
AC:
3865
AN:
1111970
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00195
AC:
118
AN:
60394
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.487
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
249
499
748
998
1247
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
148
296
444
592
740
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00198
AC:
302
AN:
152316
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.00185
AC XY:
138
AN XY:
74480
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000601
AC:
25
AN:
41584
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00229
AC:
35
AN:
15314
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.000288
AC:
1
AN:
3468
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5174
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
4818
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.000377
AC:
4
AN:
10620
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00347
AC:
236
AN:
68018
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.000473
AC:
1
AN:
2114
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.510
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
18
37
55
74
92
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Variant carriers
0
4
8
12
16
20
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.00283
Hom.:
1
Bravo
AF:
0.00178
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000289
AC:
1
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.00240
EpiControl
AF:
0.00350

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:8
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:5
-
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Oct 01, 2023
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

BMP4: BS1, BS2 -

-
Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Orofacial cleft 11 Uncertain:1
Apr 27, 2017
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. However, the evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was not sufficient to rule this variant in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. -

not specified Benign:1
-
Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Microphthalmia with brain and digit anomalies Benign:1
Apr 27, 2017
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to rule this variant out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as benign. -

Microphthalmia with brain and digit anomalies;C2677434:Orofacial cleft 11 Benign:1
Dec 17, 2024
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.58
CADD
Benign
14
DANN
Benign
0.88
PhyloP100
3.5
PromoterAI
0.010
Neutral
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.7
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.050
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs74486266; hg19: chr14-54418865; COSMIC: COSV55415334; COSMIC: COSV55415334; API