rs74513461
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points: 1P and 20B. PP2BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The NM_005045.4(RELN):c.9524A>C(p.His3175Pro) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0011 in 1,614,152 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 17 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. H3175H) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_005045.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RELN | NM_005045.4 | c.9524A>C | p.His3175Pro | missense_variant | 59/65 | ENST00000428762.6 | |
SLC26A5-AS1 | NR_110141.1 | n.1366-13655T>G | intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant | ||||
RELN | NM_173054.3 | c.9524A>C | p.His3175Pro | missense_variant | 59/64 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RELN | ENST00000428762.6 | c.9524A>C | p.His3175Pro | missense_variant | 59/65 | 5 | NM_005045.4 | P5 | |
SLC26A5-AS1 | ENST00000422488.1 | n.1366-13655T>G | intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant | 1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes ? AF: 0.00594 AC: 904AN: 152140Hom.: 10 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00147 AC: 369AN: 251244Hom.: 9 AF XY: 0.00112 AC XY: 152AN XY: 135778
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000591 AC: 864AN: 1461894Hom.: 8 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.000506 AC XY: 368AN XY: 727248
GnomAD4 genome ? AF: 0.00594 AC: 904AN: 152258Hom.: 9 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00592 AC XY: 441AN XY: 74442
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:3
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Oct 12, 2017 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center | - | - - |
Norman-Roberts syndrome;C4225327:Familial temporal lobe epilepsy 7;C4551957:Epilepsy, familial temporal lobe, 1 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics | Nov 23, 2021 | - - |
Norman-Roberts syndrome;C4225327:Familial temporal lobe epilepsy 7 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Invitae | Jan 30, 2024 | - - |
Norman-Roberts syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
not provided Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Athena Diagnostics | Feb 28, 2019 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at