rs745945481
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points: 1P and 4B. PP2BP4_ModerateBP6BS2_Supporting
The NM_001042492.3(NF1):c.6664A>G(p.Thr2222Ala) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00007 in 1,613,902 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. T2222T) has been classified as Benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001042492.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000394 AC: 6AN: 152194Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000597 AC: 15AN: 251342Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000662 AC XY: 9AN XY: 135860
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000732 AC: 107AN: 1461708Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0000715 AC XY: 52AN XY: 727152
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000394 AC: 6AN: 152194Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000672 AC XY: 5AN XY: 74356
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Uncertain:1Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Feb 16, 2019 | The NF1 c.6664A>G; p.Thr2222Ala variant (rs745945481), to our knowledge, is not described in the medical literature as a germline variant but is reported as a variant of uncertain significance by multiple laboratories in ClinVar (Variation ID: 185829). It is observed in the general population at a low overall frequency of 0.0057% (16/282734 alleles) in the Genome Aggregation Database. The threonine at codon 2222 is moderately conserved, and computational algorithms (PolyPhen-2, SIFT) predict that this variant is tolerated. However, due to the lack of clinical and functional data regarding this variant, its clinical significance cannot be determined with certainty. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Jan 11, 2024 | Variant summary: NF1 c.6601A>G (p.Thr2201Ala) results in a non-conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Three of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 7.3e-05 in 1704946 control chromosomes, predominantly at a frequency of 0.00019 within the Finnish subpopulation in the gnomAD v4 database. This frequency is close to the expected for a pathogenic variant in NF1 Neurofibromatosis Type 1 (0.00019 vs 0.00021), suggesting this variant is possibly a benign polymorphism primarily found in the Finnish subpopulation. To our knowledge, no occurrence of c.6601A>G in individuals affected with Neurofibromatosis Type 1 and no experimental evidence demonstrating its impact on protein function have been reported. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 185829). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as likely benign. - |
not provided Uncertain:1Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | May 01, 2024 | NF1: PP2, BP4 - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Dec 18, 2020 | In silico analysis supports that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function; Has not been previously published as pathogenic or benign to our knowledge; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 25925381) - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:1Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Feb 19, 2016 | ​<span style="background-color:initial">Thep.T2222A<span style="background-color:initial"> variant (also known as c.6664A>G), located in coding exon 44 of theNF1<span style="background-color:initial"> gene, results from an A to G substitution at nucleotide position 6664. The threonine at codon 2222 is replaced by alanine, an amino acid with similar properties. This variant was not reported in population based cohorts in the following databases: Database of Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (dbSNP), NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (ESP), and 1000 Genomes Project. In the ESP, this variant was not observed in 6502 samples (13004 alleles) with coverage at this position. To date, this alteration has been detected with an allele frequency of approximately 0.003% (greater than 110000 alleles tested) in our clinical cohort. This amino acid position is not well conserved in available vertebrate species. In addition, this alteration is predicted to be benign and tolerated by PolyPhen and SIFTin silico<span style="background-color:initial"> analyses, respectively. Since supporting evidence is limited at this time, the clinical significance of p.T2222A remains unclear. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Sema4, Sema4 | Jul 24, 2021 | - - |
Neurofibromatosis, type 1 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 27, 2024 | - - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome;CN230736:Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Apr 09, 2021 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at