rs746406535
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. Variant got 3 ACMG points: 4P and 1B. PM1PM5BP4
The NM_002693.3(POLG):c.1736G>A(p.Arg579Gln) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000118 in 1,609,822 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R579W) has been classified as Likely pathogenic.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_002693.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Uncertain_significance. Variant got 3 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
POLG | NM_002693.3 | c.1736G>A | p.Arg579Gln | missense_variant | 10/23 | ENST00000268124.11 | |
POLGARF | NM_001406557.1 | c.*1008G>A | 3_prime_UTR_variant | 10/23 | |||
POLG | NM_001126131.2 | c.1736G>A | p.Arg579Gln | missense_variant | 10/23 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
POLG | ENST00000268124.11 | c.1736G>A | p.Arg579Gln | missense_variant | 10/23 | 1 | NM_002693.3 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes ? AF: 0.00000657 AC: 1AN: 152120Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000283 AC: 7AN: 247392Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000373 AC XY: 5AN XY: 134144
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000123 AC: 18AN: 1457702Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0000152 AC XY: 11AN XY: 725376
GnomAD4 genome ? AF: 0.00000657 AC: 1AN: 152120Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 74296
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Jul 01, 2023 | Has not been previously published as pathogenic or benign to our knowledge; Not observed at significant frequency in large population cohorts (gnomAD); In silico analysis supports that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | May 24, 2018 | - - |
Progressive sclerosing poliodystrophy Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Wong Mito Lab, Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine | Oct 01, 2018 | The NM_002693.2:c.1736G>A (NP_002684.1:p.Arg579Gln) [GRCH38: NC_000015.10:g.89325663C>T] variant in POLG gene is interpretated to be a Uncertain Significance based on ACMG guidelines (PMID: 25741868). This variant meets the following evidence codes reported in the ACMG-guideline. BP4:Computational evidence/predictors indicate no impact on the POLG structure, function, or protein-protein interaction. Based on the evidence criteria codes applied, the variant is suggested to be Uncertain Significance. - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Invitae | Sep 09, 2022 | This sequence change replaces arginine, which is basic and polar, with glutamine, which is neutral and polar, at codon 579 of the POLG protein (p.Arg579Gln). This variant is present in population databases (rs746406535, gnomAD 0.006%). This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with POLG-related conditions. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 588951). Advanced modeling of protein sequence and biophysical properties (such as structural, functional, and spatial information, amino acid conservation, physicochemical variation, residue mobility, and thermodynamic stability) has been performed at Invitae for this missense variant, however the output from this modeling did not meet the statistical confidence thresholds required to predict the impact of this variant on POLG protein function. Algorithms developed to predict the effect of sequence changes on RNA splicing suggest that this variant may create or strengthen a splice site. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. - |
not specified Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Jul 25, 2023 | Variant summary: POLG c.1736G>A (p.Arg579Gln) results in a conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Three of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 2.8e-05 in 247392 control chromosomes (gnomAD). The available data on variant occurrences in the general population are insufficient to allow any conclusion about variant significance. To our knowledge, no occurrence of c.1736G>A in individuals affected with POLG-Related Spectrum Disorders and no experimental evidence demonstrating its impact on protein function have been reported. Five submitters have cited clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014. All submitters classified the variant as uncertain significance. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as uncertain significance. - |
Inborn genetic diseases Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | May 24, 2017 | The p.R579Q variant (also known as c.1736G>A), located in coding exon 9 of the POLG gene, results from a G to A substitution at nucleotide position 1736. The arginine at codon 579 is replaced by glutamine, an amino acid with highly similar properties. This amino acid position is not well conserved in available vertebrate species. In addition, the in silico prediction for this alteration is inconclusive. Since supporting evidence is limited at this time, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at