rs746898871

Variant names:

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Uncertain significance. The variant received 0 ACMG points: 2P and 2B. PM2BP4_Moderate

The NM_001288772.2(PIK3C2G):c.313C>A(p.Pro105Thr) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000118 in 1,613,170 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0000066 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.000012 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

PIK3C2G
NM_001288772.2 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Uncertain significance criteria provided, single submitter U:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.716

Publications

0 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

PIK3C2G (HGNC:8973): (phosphatidylinositol-4-phosphate 3-kinase catalytic subunit type 2 gamma) The protein encoded by this gene belongs to the phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) family. PI3-kinases play roles in signaling pathways involved in cell proliferation, oncogenic transformation, cell survival, cell migration, and intracellular protein trafficking. This protein contains a lipid kinase catalytic domain as well as a C-terminal C2 domain, a characteristic of class II PI3-kinases. C2 domains act as calcium-dependent phospholipid binding motifs that mediate translocation of proteins to membranes, and may also mediate protein-protein interactions. This gene may play a role in several diseases, including type II diabetes. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Jan 2014]

PIK3C2G links:

RERGL (HGNC:26213): (RERG like) Predicted to enable G protein activity and GTP binding activity. [provided by Alliance of Genome Resources, Apr 2022]

RERGL links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Uncertain_significance. The variant received 0 ACMG points.

PM2

Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.09513354).

Variant Effect in Transcripts

ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_001288772.2. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.

RefSeq Transcripts

Gene	Transcript	Tags	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon Rank	Protein	UniProt
PIK3C2G	NM_001288772.2	MANE Select	c.313C>A	p.Pro105Thr	missense	Exon 2 of 33	NP_001275701.1	O75747-1
PIK3C2G	NM_004570.6		c.313C>A	p.Pro105Thr	missense	Exon 2 of 32	NP_004561.3	O75747-2
PIK3C2G	NM_001288774.2		c.-347C>A		5_prime_UTR	Exon 2 of 33	NP_001275703.1

Ensembl Transcripts

Gene	Transcript	Tags	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon Rank	Protein	UniProt
PIK3C2G	ENST00000538779.6	TSL:5 MANE Select	c.313C>A	p.Pro105Thr	missense	Exon 2 of 33	ENSP00000445381.1	O75747-1
PIK3C2G	ENST00000546003.5	TSL:1	n.313C>A		non_coding_transcript_exon	Exon 1 of 32	ENSP00000441618.1	F5GWG6
PIK3C2G	ENST00000675017.1		c.313C>A	p.Pro105Thr	missense	Exon 2 of 33	ENSP00000501889.1	O75747-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00000657

AC:

AN:

152094

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000147

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.0000321

AC:

AN:

249038

AF XY:

0.0000370

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00000886

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000165

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.0000123

AC:

AN:

1461076

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000165

AC XY:

AN XY:

726860

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0000299

AC:

AN:

33462

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

44720

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26124

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

39686

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.000128

AC:

AN:

86252

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

53390

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.000173

AC:

AN:

5766

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00000180

AC:

AN:

1111318

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.0000497

AC:

AN:

60358

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.444

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00000657

AC:

AN:

152094

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00

AC XY:

AN XY:

74282

show subpopulations

⚠️ The allele balance in gnomAD version 4 Genomes is significantly skewed from the expected value of 0.5.

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

41438

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

15244

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3464

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5186

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4822

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10606

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

316

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000147

AC:

AN:

68016

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

2090

⚠️ The allele balance in gnomAD version 4 Genomes is significantly skewed from the expected value of 0.5. (p-value = 0), which strongly suggests a high chance of mosaicism in these individuals.

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.325

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Alfa

AF:

0.00

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00000756

ExAC

AF:

0.0000248

AC:

EpiCase

AF:

0.000164

EpiControl

AF:

0.00

ClinVar

ClinVar submissions

Significance:Uncertain significance

Revision:criteria provided, single submitter

View on ClinVar

Pathogenic

VUS

Benign

Condition

not specified (1)

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.9

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.066

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.35

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.47

CADD

Benign

(source)

DANN

Uncertain

0.98

DEOGEN2

Benign

0.036

Eigen

Benign

-0.68

Eigen_PC

Benign

-0.74

FATHMM_MKL

Benign

0.048

LIST_S2

Benign

0.75

M_CAP

Benign

0.014

MetaRNN

Benign

0.095

MetaSVM

Benign

-1.0

MutationAssessor

Benign

1.7

PhyloP100

0.72

PrimateAI

Benign

0.26

PROVEAN

Benign

-0.84

REVEL

Benign

0.061

Sift

Benign

0.035

Sift4G

Benign

0.11

Polyphen

0.47

Vest4

0.18

MutPred

0.38

Gain of catalytic residue at F109 (P = 0.0123)

MVP

0.63

MPC

0.018

ClinPred

0.033

GERP RS

1.8

PromoterAI

0.0070

Neutral

(source)

Varity_R

0.040

gMVP

0.39

Mutation Taster

=95/5

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Variant Effect in Transcripts

RefSeq Transcripts

Ensembl Transcripts

Frequencies

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over