rs746905653
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -1 ACMG points: 3P and 4B. PP2PP3_ModerateBS2
The NM_021625.5(TRPV4):c.472G>A(p.Val158Met) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000479 in 1,461,884 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_021625.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -1 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00000796 AC: 2AN: 251296Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.00000736 AC XY: 1AN XY: 135876
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000479 AC: 7AN: 1461884Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00000413 AC XY: 3AN XY: 727246
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Uncertain:1
- -
Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease axonal type 2C Uncertain:1
This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals with TRPV4-related conditions. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 448710). Algorithms developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function are either unavailable or do not agree on the potential impact of this missense change (SIFT: "Tolerated"; PolyPhen-2: "Possibly Damaging"; Align-GVGD: "Class C0"). In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. This variant is present in population databases (rs746905653, ExAC 0.009%). This sequence change replaces valine with methionine at codon 158 of the TRPV4 protein (p.Val158Met). The valine residue is moderately conserved and there is a small physicochemical difference between valine and methionine. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at