rs747185602
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. Variant got 2 ACMG points: 3P and 1B. PM2PP2BP4
The NM_001387283.1(SMARCA4):c.164C>T(p.Pro55Leu) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000206 in 1,453,060 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. P55S) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001387283.1 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Uncertain_significance. Variant got 2 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMARCA4 | NM_001387283.1 | c.164C>T | p.Pro55Leu | missense_variant | 2/36 | ENST00000646693.2 | |
SMARCA4 | NM_003072.5 | c.164C>T | p.Pro55Leu | missense_variant | 2/35 | ENST00000344626.10 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMARCA4 | ENST00000646693.2 | c.164C>T | p.Pro55Leu | missense_variant | 2/36 | NM_001387283.1 | |||
SMARCA4 | ENST00000344626.10 | c.164C>T | p.Pro55Leu | missense_variant | 2/35 | 1 | NM_003072.5 | P4 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes ? Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000206 AC: 3AN: 1453060Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00000415 AC XY: 3AN XY: 722190
GnomAD4 genome ? Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Rhabdoid tumor predisposition syndrome 2 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Invitae | Jul 16, 2023 | This sequence change replaces proline, which is neutral and non-polar, with leucine, which is neutral and non-polar, at codon 55 of the SMARCA4 protein (p.Pro55Leu). The frequency data for this variant in the population databases is considered unreliable, as metrics indicate poor data quality at this position in the gnomAD database. This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with SMARCA4-related conditions. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 570306). Advanced modeling of protein sequence and biophysical properties (such as structural, functional, and spatial information, amino acid conservation, physicochemical variation, residue mobility, and thermodynamic stability) performed at Invitae indicates that this missense variant is not expected to disrupt SMARCA4 protein function. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Jul 01, 2023 | The p.P55L variant (also known as c.164C>T), located in coding exon 1 of the SMARCA4 gene, results from a C to T substitution at nucleotide position 164. The proline at codon 55 is replaced by leucine, an amino acid with similar properties. This amino acid position is highly conserved in available vertebrate species. In addition, the in silico prediction for this alteration is inconclusive. Missense and in-frame variants in SMARCA4 are known to cause neurodevelopmental disorders; however, such associations with rhabdoid tumor predisposition syndrome including small cell carcinoma of the ovary-hypercalcemic type (SCCOHT) are exceedingly rare (Kosho T et al. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2014 Sep;166C(3):262-75; Jelinic P et al. Nat Genet. 2014 May;46(5):424-6). Based on the supporting evidence, the association of this alteration with Coffin-Siris syndrome is unknown; however, the association of this alteration with rhabdoid tumor predisposition syndrome is unlikely. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at