rs747310967

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Uncertain significance. The variant received 0 ACMG points: 4P and 4B. PM1PP3_ModerateBS2

The NM_000548.5(TSC2):c.893T>C(p.Phe298Ser) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000501 in 1,595,922 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0000066 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.0000048 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

TSC2
NM_000548.5 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:7B:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 7.63

Publications

2 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

TSC2 (HGNC:12363): (TSC complex subunit 2) This gene is a tumor suppressor gene that encodes the growth inhibitory protein tuberin. Tuberin interacts with hamartin to form the TSC protein complex which functions in the control of cell growth. This TSC protein complex negatively regulates mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1) signaling which is a major regulator of anabolic cell growth. Mutations in this gene have been associated with tuberous sclerosis and lymphangioleiomyomatosis. [provided by RefSeq, May 2022]

TSC2 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

tuberous sclerosis
Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
tuberous sclerosis 2
Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: PanelApp Australia, Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P, Genomics England PanelApp, Ambry Genetics
lymphangioleiomyomatosis
Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
tuberous sclerosis complex
Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

TSC2 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Uncertain_significance. The variant received 0 ACMG points.

PM1

In a hotspot region, there are 3 aminoacids with missense pathogenic changes in the window of +-8 aminoacids around while only 1 benign, 36 uncertain in NM_000548.5

PP3

MetaRNN computational evidence supports a deleterious effect, 0.889

BS2

High AC in GnomAdExome4 at 7 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
TSC2	NM_000548.5 link	c.893T>C	p.Phe298Ser	missense_variant	Exon 10 of 42	ENST00000219476.9	NP_000539.2	P49815-1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
TSC2	ENST00000219476.9 link	c.893T>C	p.Phe298Ser	missense_variant	Exon 10 of 42	5	NM_000548.5	ENSP00000219476.3		P49815-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00000657

AC:

AN:

152252

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.0000654

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.00000913

AC:

AN:

219132

AF XY:

0.0000170

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.0000326

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000103

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.00000485

AC:

AN:

1443670

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00000419

AC XY:

AN XY:

716330

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

33388

American (AMR)

AF:

0.0000723

AC:

AN:

41468

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

25664

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

39288

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

83282

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

52114

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5704

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00000363

AC:

AN:

1103034

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

59728

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.496

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00000657

AC:

AN:

152252

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000134

AC XY:

AN XY:

74400

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

41474

American (AMR)

AF:

0.0000654

AC:

AN:

15284

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3470

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5200

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4836

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10626

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

316

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

68044

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

2090

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.425

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Alfa

AF:

0.00

Hom.:

ExAC

AF:

0.0000248

AC:

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:7Benign:1

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Tuberous sclerosis 2

Uncertain:3Benign:1

Nov 07, 2021

Genome-Nilou Lab

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Dec 29, 2021

St. Jude Molecular Pathology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

The TSC2 c.893T>C (p.Phe298Ser) missense change has a maximum subpopulation frequency of 0.0032% in gnomAD v2.1.1 (PM2_supporting; https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/16-2108792-T-C). Six of seven in silico tools predict a deleterious effect of this variant on protein function (PP3), but to our knowledge these predictions have not been confirmed by functional assays. To our knowledge, this variant has not been reported in individuals with tuberous sclerosis complex. In summary, this variant meets criteria to be classified as of uncertain significance based on the ACMG/AMP criteria: PM2_Supporting, PP3. -

Jan 10, 2025

Molecular Pathology, Peter Maccallum Cancer Centre

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Feb 24, 2024

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided

Uncertain:3

Jul 19, 2024

GeneDx

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

In silico analysis supports that this missense variant has a deleterious effect on protein structure/function; Has not been previously published as pathogenic or benign to our knowledge; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 18466115) -

Sep 28, 2015

Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Nov 01, 2022

CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

TSC2: PM2, PP3 -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome

Uncertain:1

Sep 15, 2023

Ambry Genetics

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

The p.F298S variant (also known as c.893T>C), located in coding exon 9 of the TSC2 gene, results from a T to C substitution at nucleotide position 893. The phenylalanine at codon 298 is replaced by serine, an amino acid with highly dissimilar properties. This amino acid position is highly conserved in available vertebrate species. In addition, this alteration is predicted to be deleterious by in silico analysis. Since supporting evidence is limited at this time, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Pathogenic

0.98

BayesDel_addAF

Pathogenic

0.35

BayesDel_noAF

Pathogenic

0.36

CADD

Pathogenic

(source)

DANN

Uncertain

1.0

DEOGEN2

Pathogenic

0.87

D;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;T;.;T

Eigen

Pathogenic

0.75

Eigen_PC

Pathogenic

0.71

FATHMM_MKL

Pathogenic

0.98

LIST_S2

Uncertain

0.86

D;D;D;T;D;D;D;D;T;D;D;D;D;D;D

M_CAP

Pathogenic

0.74

MetaRNN

Pathogenic

0.89

D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D

MetaSVM

Uncertain

0.47

MutationAssessor

Uncertain

2.2

M;.;.;.;M;M;.;.;.;M;.;M;.;.;.

PhyloP100

7.6

PrimateAI

Pathogenic

0.84

PROVEAN

Pathogenic

-5.0

D;.;.;D;.;D;.;.;D;D;.;.;.;.;D

REVEL

Pathogenic

0.90

Sift

Uncertain

0.0010

D;.;.;D;.;D;.;.;D;D;.;.;.;.;D

Sift4G

Pathogenic

0.0010

D;.;.;D;.;D;.;.;D;D;.;.;.;.;D

Polyphen

0.99

D;.;.;.;D;D;.;.;D;D;.;.;.;.;.

Vest4

0.97

MutPred

0.55

Gain of MoRF binding (P = 0.0681);Gain of MoRF binding (P = 0.0681);Gain of MoRF binding (P = 0.0681);.;Gain of MoRF binding (P = 0.0681);Gain of MoRF binding (P = 0.0681);Gain of MoRF binding (P = 0.0681);Gain of MoRF binding (P = 0.0681);.;Gain of MoRF binding (P = 0.0681);Gain of MoRF binding (P = 0.0681);Gain of MoRF binding (P = 0.0681);Gain of MoRF binding (P = 0.0681);Gain of MoRF binding (P = 0.0681);.;

MVP

0.94

ClinPred

0.99

GERP RS

5.1

RBP_binding_hub_radar

0.0

RBP_regulation_power_radar

1.1

Varity_R

0.89

gMVP

0.75

Mutation Taster

=12/88

disease causing

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over